📰 News i read

Someone inside Kaiser sent me the below internal guidance concerning shots and medications for newborns.

It tells Kaiser employees that the "approach to how we introduce and administer routine newborn ... Hepatitis B vaccine" is to "avoid saying ‘it’s optional’ or ‘you can refuse’ unless directly asked” and to tell parents that "we will be giving" instead of asking consent to give. This is the antithesis of informed consent. Yet Kaiser calls it “excellent patient and family care.”

If anyone else out there can share similar emails or documents, feel free to message them to this Substack account!

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

VSRF Live is now airing on Tuesdays at 7pm Eastern / 4pm Pacific.

Tonight on VSRF Live: Marik and Kory—what comes next

I’m joined by our good friends, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory, two physicians who challenged the system during COVID and are still asking the questions others won’t.

Both co-founded the FLCCC (now the Independent Medical Alliance). Both were sidelined for it. Neither stopped.

Now they’re focused on what comes next.

Dr. Marik is taking on cancer, using repurposed drugs and metabolic therapies that challenge the standard model.

Dr. Kory continues treating long COVID, vaccine injury, and cancer patients, while exploring deeper questions around toxicity, water, and human health—and what modern medicine may be missing.

We’ll cover what still hasn’t been acknowledged from the pandemic… and whether anything has actually changed.

Or did the system just move on without accountability?

Two doctors. One shared history.
And a clear-eyed look at what’s next.

See you tonight, and bring a friend.

—Steve

I get asked all the time what someone can do to fight for medical liberty. Here’s my answer:

1. Educate yourself. Vaccines are the one product where market forces won’t protect you from harm. For all other products, the market (over time) will (with road bumps) correct for safety issues because the company can be held financially liable for harms. Since vaccine companies can’t be held liable for most vaccine harms, the market will not correct. It is therefore vital that you do your own research to protect yourself and your family. As I explained on Rogan:

2. Never shy away from discussing the truth—both in person and online. Every conversation and sharing of the facts and evidence about these products makes a difference!

3. Once a year, meet with your state representatives (house and senate) and talk to them about the importance of medical liberty. Seriously, schedule a meeting and meet with them — I find that state representatives are often more than happy to meet with their constituents. Support them with a donation if they appear supportive; and also try to support at least one group fighting for medical liberty.

   If everyone who understands the importance of medical liberty did the above three things, I think we would have long ago secured our rights.

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

It is incredibly ironic that President Donald Trump would write that his pick to lead the CDC, Erica Schwartz, will “restore the GOLD STANDARD SCIENCE at the CDC, which was an absolute disaster focused on ‘mandates’ under Sleepy Joe,” when Schwartz is the QUEEN of mandating vaccines.

Schwartz led nationwide Covid-19 vaccine deployment and has, with threat and force, mandated almost every major vaccine on civilians and military members, including mandating injection of smallpox, anthrax, and flu vaccines into U.S. Forces, and disciplining those who refused. This track record alone reflects she lacks the basic ethics and morals to lead the CDC.

Her prior promotion, let alone mandates, of nearly a dozen different vaccines leave little hope she will objectively oversee CDC’s vaccine program which has, between 1986 and the 2026, gone from 3 injections to 29 injections, including in utero, by an infant’s first birthday, while chronic childhood disease has gone from under 10% to over 40% of children, most related to immune system dysregulation.

The only thing she is likely to restore is the CDC to business as usual – cheerleading for industry instead of being a regulator over industry.

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

The Shocking Truth About Venom Genetically-Engineered Vegetable Seeds

Imagine biting into a fresh tomato or serving up a bowl of rice, unaware that deep within the plant’s DNA lies a venom protein borrowed from a snake, scorpion, or spider. It sounds like science fiction, but it’s not.

According to a peer-reviewed study published in the journal Venoms (November 2021), scientists have been exploring ways to incorporate venom proteins into vegetable seeds as a new line of defense against insects… and those developments may already be far more widespread than the public has been told.

Venom for Dinner? The Study That Started the Alarm

The journal article, titled Applications of Venom Biodiversity in Agriculture, outlines a growing body of research in which venom peptides… proteins derived from creatures like snakes, spiders, and scorpions… are used to engineer pest-resistant plants.

The rationale?

According to the study’s authors, venom-based biotechnology holds promise for creating what they call “bioinsecticides.” The idea is that plants, through genetic-engineering, can internally produce venom proteins that repel or kill attacking pests. It’s been offered by marketers as a more “natural” solution than synthetic pesticides.

But some researchers aren’t convinced… and the backlash is growing.

Dr. Bryan Ardis and G. Edward Griffin, have raised red flags about this development, warning that such extreme forms of genetic engineering could have unintended consequences, both ecological and medical.

12 minutes.

Behind the Genetic Curtain: Who’s Engineering These Seeds?

The research paper’s graphics, recently circulated in an exposé presentation that’s gone viral, reveal a startling matrix: color-coded dots representing venom types (red), corporations and universities (blue), and the genetically engineered crops (green) that carry these toxic traits.

Among the companies named are agricultural giants like Bayer, Monsanto, BASF, and even food processors like Frito-Lay. The crops? Everything from rice and corn to potatoes, melons, celery, lettuce, and even stevia.

Louisiana State University and the University of Arkansas appear alongside multinational corporations in holding patents.

It’s LEGAL To Sell Venomized Seeds In The U.S.!

If this technology is so beneficial, why hasn’t the public been informed?

One reason is that by law, GMO seed-engineering labels are not required in the U.S. The USDA’s National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard requires labeling of bioengineered foods for human consumption, but this does not specifically address seeds.

Why Weren’t We Told About the Venom?

The authors of the Venoms study states the result is that the vegetable plant itself becomes toxic to insects, potentially reducing the need for external pesticide applications. These GMO venom proteins are produced systemically throughout the plant, and of course, they end up in the leaves, stalks, roots, and the parts we eat.

From Biotech to the Buffet: Dangerous Venom in the Food Chain

The biotechnology industry argues that venom-derived proteins used in agriculture are carefully selected for specificity… meaning they are lethal to pests, but supposedly safe for humans.

Some venom components, like Exendin-4 (found in the venom of the Gila monster), are already being used in drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy to manage diabetes and weight loss.

The black box warning on Ozempic and Wegovy primarily concerns the increased risk of thyroid C-cell tumors. Specifically, the warning states that semaglutide causes thyroid C-cell tumors in rodents at clinically relevant exposures. At this point, with no long term studies, no one really knows whether semaglutide causes thyroid C-cell tumors, including medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in humans yet!

While this is called a “breakthrough” in medicine, critics argue that venom uses raise even more concerns when similar proteins are being embedded in our food supply without public knowledge and NO long term studies!

Let’s say that again… where are the long-term studies?

“Trust Us, Venom Is Safe”: The PR Problem in Modern Agriculture

There’s precious little public awareness, no major campaigns informing consumers, and apparently no labeling requirements. Even farmers may be unaware of the full implications of the seeds they’re planting if patents and proprietary protections keep those details hidden.

Now, when consumers are eventually informed… through whistleblower presentations, leaked graphics, or patent searches… the reaction is one of disbelief, followed by outrage.

The Case for Transparency and Consumer Choice

Whether you support or oppose genetically-engineered crops, the use of venom proteins raises serious ethical, medical, and ecological questions. Should a food company like Frito-Lay own patents on venom-producing potatoes that millions consume regularly?

If biotech firms and public institutions are confident in the safety and benefits of this technology, they should welcome informed debate and transparent labeling. Anything less begins to look less like innovation and more like concealment.

This all reminds me of COVID and the “safe and effective” claim by the vaccine companies, the media, and our own government.

Are We Guinea Pigs in a Global Experiment?

The application of venom biotechnology in agriculture may be one of the most shocking developments in food science. It touches on everything from food safety and corporate power to medical ethics and environmental stewardship.

As this technology continues to advance without guardrails, one thing is certain: the public deserves a full understanding of what’s being served. The last thing we want for our family is a harvest that looks great but is toxic.

Until we know more, use caution. Buy and plant heirloom seeds. We sell them, but so do a lot of other good companies.

Excerpts from Bill Heid at Off the Grid News.

See 4 Ways To Keep Monsanto Out Of Your Home Garden which lists dozens of companies that specialize in heirlooms and that are NOT owned by Monsanto or Seminis.

The legacy of Seed Savers Exchange is to tell you how to collect and store seeds now before they are tainted.

“Then God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth’; and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.” ~Genesis 1:11-12 [italics mine]

“Now the serpent was more cunning than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?” ~Genesis 3:1

****For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Ad-free, independent work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post Bio-Engineered Venom in our Food, Veggie Seeds, Common Drugs appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

I wanted to know how Pompa became Pompa. He explained his “pain-to-purpose-to-promise” journey in this week’s podcast episode.

Watch the full episode here:

Here’s a clip covering how it is not controversial in FDA documentation that vaccines can cause brain damage.

A clip of us discussing how glyphosate companies want to be free to harm like vaccine companies.

In this clip Pompa simplifies why healing starts with the root cause.

In this clip, Pompa addresses:

Real detox is a cellular issue. You have to fix what’s broken there.

And a clip where Pompa explains how his pain turned into purpose.

If you enjoyed episode 5 then please share it! Episode 6 will be dropping soon!

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

The so-called journalists that call themselves “fact checkers” do incredible damage to themselves and the pursuit of truth.

My last Substack about the controls used to license childhood vaccines that showed how the “fact checkers” are wrong clearly got under their skin, as it has caused numerous “fact check” inquiries. These folks clearly do not want to be challenged by facts.

For example, here is a notice I got from LinkedIn about an article that detailed the control used in every clinical trial relied upon to license routine childhood vaccines, showing clearly none used a placebo, but yet somehow was found to be “misinformation.”

I also got a message about this claim from some self-styled “fact-check journalist” who plainly cannot read basic FDA documentation nor bother to look up the FDA and CDC definition of “placebo.”

Bottom line, this highlights that if you want the facts about these products, make sure to look at the primary sources yourself. Don’t take my word for it, and certainly don’t take the word of any “fact checker.” Check the primary sources. Like the ones linked to for every vaccine in my last article that got the “fact checkers” in a tizzy.

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

No matter how many times the “experts” swear up-and-down that the control group in the clinical trial to license the original Salk polio vaccine used "salt water,” it will never make it true. It is just a flat-out falsity. And at this point, given how many times I have corrected them, a flat out lie.

But before we get to the official report for this trial showing it is a lie, let me directly quote a few of these false claims.

In 2023, Dr. Paul Offit, considered one of the world’s leading vaccinologists, in an article directly attacking me, expressly stated that: “In 1954, 420,000 first and second graders in the United States were inoculated with Jonas Salk’s inactivated polio vaccine; 200,000 were inoculated with salt water.” I quickly corrected Offit’s claim that “salt water” was used in this article.

Despite correcting Dr. Offit, in 2025, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), where Offit runs the Vaccine Education Center, falsely claimed this trial used a “saline placebo.”

Just days ago, ironically, when someone posted a clip of me speaking before the Kennedy Center, stating that no routine injected childhood vaccine on the schedule had been licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial, a community note was added citing to the above CHOP page claiming “the original polio vaccine tested against saline.” Here is what that looked like:

Then, when I posted on top of that note and showed the evidence that none of the trials relied upon to license these vaccines had a placebo-control group, the community note disappeared. Funny how that happens.

Here is the reality. It is categorically false to claim that 200,000 children were injected with salt water in the Salk polio vaccine trial. The official final report from the Salk trial, on page 51, describes precisely what these 200,000 children received as a control. It was an injection that included, among other things, the following ingredients: “199 solution” (a synthetic tissue culture medium and ethanol), “phenol red,” “antibiotics,” and “formalin.” Don’t take my word for it, see the full report for yourself.

No matter how many times so-called “experts” claim the control in this trial received saline, or how many times someone attempts to add a “fact check” or “community note,” it’s still false. Try as they want, they cannot change the fact that the control group in the Salk trial were not injected with saline but rather a brew of active, toxic, and other ingredients.

That is just the hard cold fact that they can never change unless they can get rid of every physical and digital copy of the original Salk report. For anyone bold enough to attempt that feat, good luck getting my original copy from a bank vault deep in an unnamed New York bank.

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

VSRF Live is now airing on Tuesdays at 7pm Eastern / 4pm Pacific.

Tonight we welcome back Raphael Lataster, PhD, an Australian scholar and former healthcare professional who’s taking a hard look at one of the most important questions of our time:

What happens when the people labeling “misinformation” get it wrong?

Through his publication, Okay Then News, Dr. Lataster has been tracking something most people have noticed, but few are willing to say out loud: the people labeling “misinformation” aren’t nearly as reliable as they claim.

And when they do get it wrong? No accountability. No correction. Just silence…or a quiet reversal.

Tonight, we break down how this system actually works: how narratives are shaped, how dissent gets filtered out, and what happens when institutions that once claimed authority over truth start losing credibility in real time.

We’ll revisit major COVID-era claims: what was said, what was dismissed, and what’s now being acknowledged, often years later.

We’ll also look at why certain questions remain off-limits, and how to think clearly in a filtered, politicized information landscape.

If you’ve been paying attention, you’ve seen the pattern: claims dismissed, critics silenced, narratives shift. And no one is held accountable.

That’s not science.

When questioning becomes unacceptable, science stops being science.

I’m looking forward to this, and I hope to see you tonight.

Steve

PS: If you haven’t already….Please take 15 seconds to take a stand!

Please sign the VSRF petition to end the liability shield!

Sign here. It takes less than a minute.

For 40 years, the vaccine system has worked like this:

Mandate the product.
Remove the liability.

Manufacturers face no consequences, even when people are harmed.
No accountability. No incentive to improve. Just guaranteed customers.

Why now

For the first time in decades, we have an opening:

• Public support is shifting

• Bills are on the table (S. 3853, H.R. 4668)

• Leadership is changing

And with midterms approaching, pressure actually matters.

What this does

This petition is simple:

Restore liability.
Restore accountability.
End mandates without recourse.

Bottom line

Sign it.
Share it.

Or sit it out, and nothing changes.

PPS: PLEASE SHARE OUR SOCIALS!

• VSRF Promo on X

• VSRF Promo on Gab

• VSRF Promo on Gettr

• VSRF on Truth Social

• VSRF on Rumble

• VSRF on Instagram

The post Denial: How Refusing to Face the Facts about Our Autism Epidemic Hurts Children, Families, and Our Future appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

I was recently sent the following two links which claim that placebo-control groups were used to license routine childhood vaccines:

• Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia - Technically Speaking: 75 Years of Placebo-Controlled Vaccine Testing in the U.S.

• American Academy of Pediatrics - Fact Checked: Childhood Vaccines Are Carefully Studied—Including with Placebos—to Ensure They’re Safe and Effective

If you read these two articles, you will notice they contain no actual evidence and no link to any clinical trial. That is because the reality is that not a single routine injected childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. Nor, when another vaccine was used as the control, was that vaccine licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. And so on and so forth down the chain.

Unlike these two nonsense articles, which claim to be “fact checks,” below is the actual facts with the actual evidence from the FDA showing exactly what the control was when licensing each routine childhood vaccine. (You can also read a more fulsome, fun, narrated version of this list in Chapter 10 of Vaccines, Amen.)

One last thing, as for the definition of what is a “placebo,” per the FDA, in its guidance regarding placebo-controlled trials: “Placebos, defined as inert substances with no pharmacologic activity.” Also see this FDA source: “placebo control … group that receives an inert treatment…” And per the CDC, “A substance or treatment that has no effect on living beings.” With that, here is the list:

• HepB vaccine (Birth 1M 6M)

  • Recombivax HB (Merck) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control & 5 days of safety monitoring after injection. See Package insert § 6.1.

  • Engerix B (GSK) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control & 4 days of safety monitoring after injection. See Package insert § 6.1.

• DTaP vaccine (2M 4M 6M 15M 4Y)

  • Infanrix (GSK) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (DTP vaccine used as a control) & up to 30 days of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1. (Note that DTP was not licensed in a placebo-controlled trial and increases mortality.)

  • Daptacel (Sanofi) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (DT or DTP vaccine used as control) & 2 months of safety review after injection except one trial which was 6 months with no control, 1,454 children, and “[w]ithin 30 days following any dose of DAPTACEL, 3.9% subjects reported at least one serious adverse event.” See Package insert § 6.1. (See note regarding DTP under Infanrix, above.)

• PCV vaccine (2M 4M 6M 12M)

  • Prevnar 13, PCV-13 (Wyeth, part of Pfizer) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (Prevnar 7 used as a control, and Prevnar 7 was licensed based on trial in which the control was another experimental vaccine) & 6 months of safety review after injection which found, “Serious adverse events reported following vaccination in infants and toddlers occurred in 8.2% among Prevnar 13 recipients and 7.2% among Prevnar 7 recipients.” See Package insert § 6.1. (Note the package insert for Prevnar 7 states the control in its licensing trial was an “Investigational meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine.”)

  • Vaxneuvance PCV-15 (Merck) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (Prevnar 13 used as the control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection, finding that, “Among children who received VAXNEUVANCE (N=3,349) or Prevnar 13 (N=1,814) … serious adverse events up to 6 months following vaccination with the 4-dose series were reported by 9.6% of VAXNEUVANCE recipients and by 8.9% of Prevnar 13 recipients.” Deemed “safe” because, “[t]here were no notable patterns or numerical imbalances between vaccination groups.” See Package insert § 6.1.

  • Prevnar 20, PCV-20 (Pfizer) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (Prevnar 13 was used as the control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection that again showed high rates of serious events (this time broken up into two categories – “serious adverse events (SAEs)” and “newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions (NDCMCs)”) in both vaccine groups but deemed “safe” because “no notable patterns or imbalances between vaccine groups.” See Package insert § 6.1; Clinical Review.

• Polio vaccine (2M 4M 6M 4Y)

  • IPOL (Sanofi) licensed in 1990 for babies based on trials with no placebo control & 3 days of safety review after injection. Sanofi reports that, “Although no causal relationship has been established, deaths have occurred in temporal association after vaccination of infants with IPV.” See Package insert at 14-17. (Note that IPOL is an injected polio vaccine and is the only polio vaccine used in the U.S. for over two decades. It is a very different product than the polio vaccine developed by Salk in the 1950s—and, as noted above, ceased being used in the U.S. in the 1960s—and hence the trials of Salk’s vaccine from the early 1950s were not relied upon to license IPOL.)

• Hib vaccine (2M 4M 6M 12M)

  • ActHIB (Sanofi) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (Hepatitis B vaccine used as control) & 30 days of safety review after injection during which 3.4% experienced a serious adverse event but “[n]one was assessed by the investigators [Sanofi] as related to the study of vaccines.” See Package insert § 6.1; Basis of Approval at 8.

  • Hiberix (GSK) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (ActHIB used as the control) & 31 days of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1; Clinical review at 20-21.

  • Liquid PedvaxHIB (Merck) licensed for babies based on trials with no placebo control (Lyophilized PedvaxHIB used a control) & 3 days of safety review after injection. See Package insert at 6-8. (Note that Lyophilized PedvaxHIB was tested in a trial in which controls were given lactose, aluminum adjuvant, and thimerosal and there is no indication Lyophilized PedvaxHIB was ever licensed.)

• Rotavirus vaccine (2M 4M 6M) (Note that every vaccine on the CDC childhood schedule is given via injection, except for one flu vaccine given by nasal spray and the rotavirus vaccines, which are given by oral drops .)

  • Rotarix (GSK) licensed for babies based on trials without a placebo control (the control group received an oral drop that included Dextran, Sorbitol, Amino Acids, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, and Xanthan) & 31 days of safety review after oral dose and up to a year in some trials for cases of intussusception. There were more deaths in the group receiving Rotarix than the purported placebo. As disclosed by the FDA and GSK: “During the entire course of 8 clinical studies (Studies 1 to 8), there were 68 (0.19%) deaths following administration of ROTARIX (n = 36,755) and 50 (0.15%) deaths following placebo administration (n = 34,454). The most commonly reported cause of death following vaccination was pneumonia, which was observed in 19 (0.05%) recipients of ROTARIX and 10 (0.03%) placebo recipients (RR: 1.74, 95% CI: 0.76, 4.23).” See Package insert § 6.1 (claims used a placebo); Clinical review at 23-24 (admits the purported “placebo” included all the foregoing ingredients).

  • RotaTeq (Merck) licensed for babies based on trials without a placebo control (the control group received an oral drop that included Polysorbate-80, Tissue Culture Medium, Fetal Bovine Serum, and Sodium Phosphate) & 42 days of safety review after each oral dose and up to a year for cases of intussusception. See Package insert § 6.1 (claims used placebo); Clinical reports at 445 etc. (admits the purported “placebo” included all the foregoing ingredients).

• Covid-19 vaccine (6M 8M and then Annually)

  • Comirnaty (Pfizer) authorized for emergency use in babies based on trial with a placebo control (finally!) & 6 months of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1. (Note that Pfizer’s EUA was revoked and it is not currently licensed for children under age 5.) Also, while Comirnaty’s trial had a placebo control group, that group was unblinded and most were vaccinated during the 6-month safety review period. The 16- and 17-year-old data is not separated from the adult data, but the 12- to 15-year-old data is separated and included only 1,131 children who received a vaccine, and the case of one participant reflects how this trial was conducted.)

  • Spikevax (Moderna) authorized for emergency use in babies based on trial with placebo control. Depending on the age group, the median duration of blinded safety follow-up was 51 to 71 days. Placebo controls were unblinded and mostly vaccinated during the trial. See Package insert at § 6.1; FDA Briefing at 10.

• Flu vaccine (6M 7M and then Annually)

  • The formulation for each influenza vaccine changes annually and there is no clinical trial carried out for each new formulation. (In any event, none of the clinical trials for the original formulation of any injected influenza vaccine for children had a placebo control group, see letter pp.13-14, even though some adult trials did, showing it could have been done. See FDA documentation and compare child and adult portions of Section 6.1 of each flu vaccine package insert. The one inhaled influenza vaccine’s original trial had a placebo but, again, its formulation changes every year and is not safety tested in any trial.)

• MMR vaccine (12M 4Y)

  • M-M-R-II (Merck) licensed based on a trial with no placebo control & 42 days of safety review after injection in a trial with a total of only 834 children of which a third developed gastrointestinal issues and a third respiratory issues. See Clinical reports. (This patently deficient, underpowered, unblinded, and non-randomized trial is unsurprisingly not even listed in the safety section of M-M-R-II’s package insert. Also note that the original MMR’s clinical trial was similarly deficient and also showed a high and concerning rate of gastrointestinal, respiratory and other issues, as compared to the small untreated control group—see pages 12 and 13. In any event, the original MMR was a different product that did not include millions of pieces of human DNA and cellular debris, as does M-M-R-II, which is likely why it was not used as a control in the trial for M-M-R-II).

  • Priorix (GSK) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (M-M-R-II used as the control) & 6 months of safety review after injection in which both vaccine groups had a high rate of serious adverse events, emergency room visits, and new onset of chronic diseases (e.g., autoimmune disorders, asthma, type I diabetes, vasculitis, celiac disease, thrombocytopenia, and allergies). See Package insert § 6.1; Sup materials at 12.

• Varicella (chicken pox) vaccine (12M 4Y)

  • Varivax (Merck) licensed based on trials with no placebo control & 70 days of safety review after injection. In the one controlled trial of 956 children, around half received Varivax and half received the “placebo” injection of 45 mg of neomycin per milliliter. There was one trial in which 32 children received Varivax and 29 children received nothing and then received Varivax eight weeks later; during this eight-week period, the Varivax group had double the rate of ear infection and a 50% increase in respiratory infection. As for serious adverse events, Merck did not consider any related to Varivax. See Package insert § 6.1; Merck study at 2; Clinical reports.

• HepA vaccine (12M 18M)

  • Havrix (GSK) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (Engerix-B was used as a control) & 31 days of safety review after injection with a phone call follow-up at 6 months. See Package insert § 6.1.

  • Vaqta (Merck) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (an injection of AAHS, an aluminum adjuvant, and thimerosal, a form of mercury, were used as a control) & up to 42 days of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1 (using term “placebo”); Merck study at 454 (admits the purported “placebo” included all the foregoing ingredients). (Note that trials for Havrix and Vaqta occurred at roughly the same time and, because there was no licensed Hepatitis A vaccine at that time, there was no excuse for not using a placebo control in these trials. It is also startling that Engerix-B, which had 4 days of safety monitoring in its trial, was used as the control for Havrix, and that an injection of known cyto-and-neuro toxic substances, AAHS and thimerosal, were used as a control for Vaqta instead of just a saline injection.)

• Tdap vaccine (11Y)

  • Adacel (Sanofi) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (Td, for adult use, was used as a control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1.

  • Boostrix (GSK) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (DECAVAC or Adacel was used as a control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1.

• HPV vaccine (9Y 9 ½Y)

  • Gardasil 9 (Merck) was licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed after injection for 1 month in five of the clinical trials, 6 months in a lot consistency trial, and 4 years in one trial of women aged 16 to 26 years (reflecting that a safety trial of a more appropriate duration is possible). These Gardasil 9 trials were either not controlled or used Gardasil 4 as the control, except for one trial in which 306 participants received a placebo but only after receiving the full series of Gardasil 4 injections. See Clinical review at 17-19. (Note that in Gardasil 4’s clinical trial, controls received an aluminum adjuvant, AAHS, except 320 people labeled “Saline Placebo” that actually received all vaccine ingredients except antigens and AAHS. Also, across all these trials, 2-3% of participants receiving vaccine or aluminum adjuvant—used to induce autoimmunity—had a suspected autoimmune disorder.)

• MenACYW vaccine (11Y 16Y)

  • Menactra (Sanofi) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (Menomune used as the control, and amazingly the safety section of the package insert for Menomune lists this same trial in which it is being used as a control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1.

  • Menveo (GSK) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (Menactra, Boostrix, or other vaccines used as a control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1.

  • MenQuadfi (Sanofi) licensed based on trials with no placebo control (Menveo or other vaccines used as a control) & up to 6 months of safety review after injection. See Package insert § 6.1. (The three Men4 vaccines provide another good example of the vaccine safety pyramid scheme because Menomune was licensed without a placebo-controlled trial and then used as the control to license Menactra; Menactra is then used as the control to license Menveo; and then Menveo is used as the control to license MenQuadfi. The actual safety profile, putting aside the limited 6-month safety period, is unknown since Menomune’s safety baseline was never established in a placebo-controlled trial.)

• NON-ROUTINE VACCINE: MenB vaccine (16Y 16 ½Y + if indicated)

  • Bexsero (GSK) licensed based on trials with no placebo control group (either uncontrolled or control group was given an injection of aluminum hydroxide and, in one trial involving 120 adolescents, a saline injection followed by an injection of Menveo and hence FDA labels this an “active control” and not a “placebo control” trial) & 30 days of safety review after injection. See Summary basis at 14-15; Clinical review at 40.

  • Trumenba (Pfizer) licensed based on trials with no placebo control group other than 12 people in a dose ranging phase II study (otherwise the controls were injection of Gardasil+placebo, dTaP-IPV+placebo, HepA+placebo, or Menactra+Adacel+placebo) & 30 days of safety review after injection for one of the three trials and up to 11 months in the other two trials. See Summary basis at 4; Clinical review at 9-10.

• NON-ROUTINE VACCINE: PPSV23 vaccine (2Y+ if indicated)

  • Pneumovax 23 (Merck) is licensed for children 2 years and older but there is no indication that there was any clinical trial involving anyone younger than 16 years of age that the FDA relied upon to license this vaccine. See FDA documentation.

• NON-ROUTINE VACCINE: Dengue vaccine (6Y+ if previously had dengue and live in area dengue is endemic)

  • Dengvaxia (Sanofi) licensed based on a trial with 11,474 children receiving a placebo control (saline injection) & 5 years of safety review after injection. Meaning, the 17th and last vaccine on the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule, is apparently the first vaccine that underwent a longer-term placebo-controlled trial prior to licensure! This trial stands as the proof that a longer-term placebo-controlled trial of a childhood vaccine is possible! See Statistical review at 10; Package insert at 4. (Note for this vaccine, it was learned that children under 6 years old had an increased risk of severe harm and death from this vaccine—harm that would likely never have been uncovered by the trials performed for any of the other 16 vaccines. It was also found that children older than 6 who had never had dengue and received this vaccine likewise had a seriously increased risk of severe harm and death. Hence, this vaccine is only to be given to older children who have previously had dengue. As disclosed by the FDA and Sanofi: “Those not previously infected are at increased risk for severe dengue disease when vaccinated and subsequently infected with dengue virus.” This vaccine is only recommended for children in endemic dengue areas and dengue is not endemic in the United States.)

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

I recently learned how Cayenne Pepper Can Save a Life during a heart attack. But we also know cayenne has amazing healing benefits for peripheral neuropathy. Neuropathy refers to damage to the peripheral nerves, primarily in the hands and feet. This damage results in pain, numbness, tingling, and weakness. The causes of neuropathy range from diabetes and injuries to neurotoxins found in many pharma meds.

Barbara O’Neill started out running health retreats in Australia, teaching what she calls “simple home remedies”—interventions using ingredients available in any kitchen. (source) You may have heard of her. Her talks walk us through protocols for conditions that conventional medicine just barely manages rather than resolves.

Barbara O’Neill is being applauded for the simplicity of her treatments, the excellent results, as well as her wisdom and kindness.

A man in his late fifties arrived at one of O’Neill’s retreats wheelchair-bound with multiple sclerosis. He described his feet as two lumps of rock hanging off the end of his legs. He couldn’t feel them during the day. At night, the sensation was unbearable—not pain exactly, but a weight, a wrongness, the body’s confused signals firing into numbness. He came expecting nothing. He left standing, with tears on his face, because someone had wrapped cayenne pepper and olive oil around his feet.

Barbara O’Neill’s Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment?

A double layer of paper towel, cut to foot size. Olive oil dotted across the surface—not poured, just enough to create adhesion. Half a teaspoon of cayenne pepper sprinkled on top. The foot placed directly onto this, the whole thing wrapped in cling film, a sock pulled over. Worn overnight. (source)

The first morning, the man reported he’d slept through the night with no discomfort. They skipped a night, then repeated the treatment. The next morning: tingling/pins and needles. The first sign of life returning to tissue that conventional medicine had written off.

O’Neill has repeated this protocol with others. An 80-year-old woman developed peripheral neuropathy after chemotherapy—a common side effect that oncologists mention but rarely solve. O’Neill visited her at home, prepared six compresses in advance, folded them into a ziplock bag, and left them at her bedside for the week. The woman could apply them herself each night. The results followed the same pattern: warmth returning, then sensation, then function. No clinic visits. No prescriptions. Paper towel, olive oil, cayenne pepper, and time. (source)

Cayenne Has A Self-Regulating Effect – You Know When To Stop

O’Neill explains that the protocol is self-regulating. When she puts a cayenne compress on her own feet—feet with healthy circulation—she wakes at four in the morning wanting to rip it off. The heat becomes unbearable. But someone with compromised circulation feels nothing the first night, perhaps a mild warmth the second, and only after several consecutive applications does the sensation build. The treatment essentially reads the body’s condition and responds proportionally. Healthy tissue responds fast; damaged tissue needs repetition before blood flow improves enough to register.

This video is a visual to remember. 7 minutes.

What Cayenne Actually Does For Peripheral Neuropathy

The mode of action isn’t a secret. Cayenne pepper is a blood stimulant –not in the caffeine sense –but something that moves blood through tissue. It opens capillaries and strengthens arterial walls. Any part of the body receiving more blood receives more oxygen, more of the raw materials cells need to repair, and more nutrients.

The biblical insight (Leviticus 17:11) that “the life of the flesh is in the blood” turns out to be medically correct. Tissue that doesn’t receive adequate blood flow doesn’t just underperform—it dies. O’Neill describes an outcome she’s observed repeatedly: feet that are chronically cold eventually lose sensation at the edges of the toes. The progression from “my feet are always cold” to amputation isn’t inevitable, but it’s common enough that O’Neill treats cold feet as an early warning system.

Ten Pages in Back to Eden

In Back to Eden, a 1939 compendium of herbal medicine, Jethro Kloss alloted approximately half a page to most of the herbs. Cayenne received 10 pages. That wasn’t accidental.

Kloss quoted two physicians in his extended treatment: one states it is “impossible to abuse” cayenne pepper—meaning no amount causes toxicity—while another claims it will “never cause a lesion.” The very warm sensation users feel is stimulation, not damage. At the right time, the body registers heat because blood is moving.

This safety profile matters. The question a skeptic reasonably asks is: if cayenne is so effective, why isn’t it dangerous? Most substances that produce strong physiological effects carry corresponding risks. Cayenne’s answer appears to be that it works with the body’s existing systems rather than overriding them. It doesn’t force blood where blood shouldn’t go. It opens channels and lets circulation do what circulation does when blocked.

The range of internal applications supports this. Like in my cayenne powder, ACV and raw honey recipe for sore throats and coughs—it tingles initially, then the discomfort subsides and the cough/sore throat feels relieved. It always works!  For low stomach acid and sluggish digestion, O’Neill recommends a bit of cayenne in water before meals to wake up the gastric system. Some of O’Neill’s clients take it three times daily as a cardiovascular maintenance protocol, building from a few sprinkles to a quarter teaspoon over time. And cayenne tincture pairs beautifully with hawthorn tincture for heart issues like angina, high B/P, arrhythmia & CHF.

The “impossible to abuse” claim gains credibility when the same substance addresses throats, stomachs, hearts, sudden heart attacks, and feet without toxicity anywhere.

What Isn’t Being Offered

Peripheral neuropathy affects millions, particularly diabetics and chemotherapy patients. Conventional treatment focuses on managing the pain with medication –gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine—rather than restoring sensation by addressing the root cause. The medical literature treats lost nerve function as largely irreversible. Patients are taught to cope, to check their feet visually since they can’t feel injuries, to accept diminished capacity as permanent.

One feeling tingling or pins and needles (after two nights of cayenne compresses) represents something conventional medicine doesn’t account for. Are Barbara O’Neill’s patients experiencing placebo effects powerful enough to restore nerve function, or is something actually happening in that tissue—like blood reaching places it hadn’t reached in a while, nerves remembering how to signal, etc.?

Those two physicians Kloss quoted in his 1939 book Back to Eden, claiming cayenne is impossible to abuse and incapable of causing lesions, were making empirical observations that haven’t been disproven—only ignored. Barbara O’Neill’s materials cost just pennies and the protocol takes minutes to prepare. The question isn’t whether it works —she’s repeated the same results enough times —but why isn’t this the first thing tried?

More gifts from our Creator to help regenerate nerves:

Lion’s Mane Mushroom Remyelinates Nerves, Combats Dementia

Why This Zeolite Is So Good For Cleaning Up the Entire Body – (scroll down and read the science in both #23b and 24)

“O LORD, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom hast thou made them all: the earth is full of thy riches.” ~Psalm 104:24

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post Barbara O’Neill’s Cayenne Protocol For Peripheral Neuropathy appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

I had a great conversation with Jessica Sutta! She shares why she was excluded from the band’s reunion, her inspiring advocacy, and a bunch more--including the definition of anti-vaxxer, whether the Covid-19 vaccine is a vaccine, and an incredible Kaiser doctor admission.

Watch the full episode here:

Here is a clip of us cracking up about the response as to why Jessica was excluded from returning to the Pussycat Dolls band...

A clip of us reviewing the dictionary definition of ‘anti-vaxxer.’

And a clip of an incredible admission by a Kaiser doctor to Jessica.

Hope you enjoy this episode — you can watch it in full here!

Stay tuned for episode #5 dropping next week.

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

My good friend, the legendary Dr. Paul Marik, has just published an excellent article on the best way to treat/prevent coronary artery disease (CAD) including addressing key questions such as “should you take a statin?”

Check it out! Click on the image below to read the article:

Share

VSRF Live is now airing on Tuesdays at 7pm Eastern / 4pm Pacific.

I am very excited to welcome back Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist who doesn’t dodge the hard questions. Tonight, we’re stepping into a topic that’s rarely explained clearly, but affects all of us.

Gain-of-function research.
Global biolabs.
Who funds it, and who’s accountable when something goes wrong?

From there, we’ll take a closer look at what’s happening inside the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Who’s shaping the decisions?
What drives them?
And how much visibility does the public actually have?

If you’ve ever felt like key decisions are being made somewhere out of view, you’re not imagining it. That’s exactly what we’re going to discuss tonight.

See you this evening, and bring a friend!

Steve

PS: If you haven’t already….Please take 15 seconds to take a stand!

Please sign the VSRF petition to end the liability shield!

Sign here. It takes less than a minute.

For 40 years, the vaccine system has worked like this:

Mandate the product.
Remove the liability.

Manufacturers face no consequences, even when people are harmed.
No accountability. No incentive to improve. Just guaranteed customers.

Why now

For the first time in decades, we have an opening:

• Public support is shifting

• Bills are on the table (S. 3853, H.R. 4668)

• Leadership is changing

And with midterms approaching, pressure actually matters.

What this does

This petition is simple:

Restore liability.
Restore accountability.
End mandates without recourse.

Bottom line

Sign it.
Share it.

Or sit it out, and nothing changes.

PPS: PLEASE SHARE OUR SOCIALS!

• VSRF Promo on X

• VSRF Promo on Gab

• VSRF Promo on Gettr

• VSRF on Truth Social

• VSRF on Rumble

• VSRF on Instagram

Executive summary

I used AlterAI to solve a 92 year old medical mystery of a massive polio-like outbreak at Los Angeles County General Hospital in 1934. Whoa!

This could be considered the first clearly reported outbreak of what we now call ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome).

The mystery of this 1934 outbreak has finally been solved. Definitively. All the pieces fit together perfectly like a jigsaw puzzle.

And we now also know what may be causing most cases of ME/CFS today!

The setup: 1934, Los Angeles County General Hospital

In 1934, shortly after the new Los Angeles County General Hospital (now part of LAC+USC Medical Center) opened in late 1933, a notable outbreak of illness struck its hospital workers — primarily nurses, doctors, and other staff.

Key Facts About the Outbreak

• Time period: It began in May 1934 and continued through the summer and into late 1935 (with some cases reported up to December 1935).

• Number affected: Approximately 198 hospital employees became acutely ill.

  • This represented a significant portion of the staff: roughly 10.7% of the nurses and 5.4% of the physicians at the time.

  • Young women (especially nurses under age 30) were disproportionately affected.

• Symptoms: The illness was initially diagnosed as atypical poliomyelitis (polio), but it differed from classic polio in important ways:

  • Rapid onset of muscle weakness, severe pain (often worsened by exercise), fatigue, neck/back stiffness, ataxia, clonic twitches/cramps, vasomotor instability, and sensory issues.

  • Many patients experienced relapses or prolonged fatigue.

  • Paralysis was less common or different in pattern compared to typical polio outbreaks of the era.

  • A small number of cases had more severe or lasting disability; most recovered to some degree, but some remained chronically ill with ongoing fatigue and neurological symptoms.

Historical Significance

This event is widely recognized today as the first recorded cluster outbreak of what is now called myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), also known historically as epidemic neuromyasthenia or (in modern terms) part of the spectrum of ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome).

At the time, it occurred amid a broader polio epidemic in Southern California, but the hospital cluster stood out because:

• It mainly affected medical personnel (who had close patient contact) rather than the general population or children.

• The clinical picture and epidemiology did not perfectly match typical polio.

A detailed epidemiological study was conducted by U.S. Public Health Service officer Alexander G. Gilliam and published in 1938 as Public Health Bulletin No. 240: “Epidemiological study of an epidemic diagnosed as poliomyelitis occurring among the personnel of the Los Angeles County General Hospital during the summer of 1934.”

Context and Legacy

• The new hospital (a massive 1,680-bed facility) was treating many patients during a regional polio surge, which may have contributed to exposure among staff.

• Some contemporary observers speculated about hysteria, toxin exposure, or an unknown infectious agent; debates continue today about the exact cause (viral? enterovirus-related? other?).

• A smaller recurrence was noted among staff in 1935.

• This outbreak is frequently cited in the history of ME/CFS as an early example of “epidemic” or post-viral fatigue syndromes in institutional settings.

The Los Angeles County General Hospital itself was a major public facility serving the indigent and handling infectious diseases. It opened just months before the outbreak began.

Was it caused by a virus? Nope. Ruled out!

The exact cause remains unknown to this day! (per Grok)

What investigators concluded at the time (1934–1938)

Alexander Gilliam of the U.S. Public Health Service conducted the detailed epidemiological study. He described the outbreak as “atypical poliomyelitis” because:

• It occurred during a broader regional polio epidemic in California.

• Many symptoms overlapped with polio (fever, muscle weakness, pain, stiffness, neurological involvement).

• Transmission appeared consistent with person-to-person contact (higher rates among staff on communicable disease wards; no evidence of contaminated food, milk, or water as the source).

However, Gilliam and contemporaries noted key differences from classic paralytic polio:

• Much higher attack rate among adult hospital staff (especially young female nurses) rather than children.

• Prominent features like severe pain worsened by exercise, sensory disturbances, vasomotor instability, relapses, and prolonged fatigue.

• Less typical paralysis and muscle wasting.

No specific virus was isolated and proven to be the cause in the hospital cluster, despite attempts.

Some researchers tried to recover a virus from the wider 1934 Los Angeles polio epidemic, but the staff outbreak was clinically and epidemiologically distinct enough to be called “atypical.”

Modern understanding (ME/CFS perspective)

This 1934 hospital cluster is now widely regarded as the first well-documented epidemic of what later became known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) or ME/CFS.

• Many ME/CFS experts and historians believe it was triggered by an infectious agent (likely a virus, possibly an enterovirus related to but distinct from poliovirus, or a respiratory virus).

• Cluster outbreaks like this strongly suggest an infectious (transmissible) trigger, with person-to-person spread.

• However, no causative pathogen has ever been conclusively identified for this specific outbreak or for ME/CFS in general. Decades of research have not pinpointed a single virus (or other microbe) that reliably causes the full syndrome.

Speculative ideas over the years have included:

• An unknown enterovirus or variant.

• Post-viral immune dysregulation.

• In rare fringe discussions: possible links to early polio vaccine trials or experimental work happening around that time — but there is no solid evidence that the 1934 hospital staff outbreak was caused by a vaccine or vaccine trial.

Bottom line

• Most likely infectious trigger? Yes — the epidemiology points strongly toward a contagious agent, probably viral.

• Proven to be caused by a specific virus? No. The cause was never identified, and it remains one of the historical mysteries in the story of ME/CFS.

This outbreak is often cited precisely because it shows how a seemingly “polio-like” illness could produce long-term disability and relapsing fatigue in a way that classic polio usually did not.

Grok says the cause of ME/CFS is still unknown to this day (but Grok is wrong because we now KNOW the cause)

Grok said that the exact cause of ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) is still unknown as of 2026!

Major health authorities and recent reviews (including the CDC, NIH, Mayo Clinic, and Johns Hopkins) consistently state that scientists do not know the precise underlying cause. It is widely viewed as a complex, heterogeneous condition that likely involves multiple contributing factors rather than a single pathogen or defect.

Current Consensus on Causes/Triggers

• Often triggered by infection: Many cases (including the 1934 Los Angeles hospital outbreak we discussed earlier) begin after a viral or bacterial illness. Common associations include Epstein-Barr virus (mono), other herpesviruses, enteroviruses, flu, and now SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), where a subset of Long COVID patients meet full ME/CFS criteria. However, no single infectious agent has been proven to cause all (or even most) cases.

• Immune system dysfunction: Chronic low-grade inflammation, altered cytokine profiles, overactive or exhausted immune responses, and possible autoimmunity are frequently observed. Some studies identify distinct “immunotypes” among patients.

• Mitochondrial and energy metabolism problems: Impaired cellular energy production (ATP), mitochondrial dysfunction, and issues with how the body handles exertion are central features in many patients.

• Other factors under study: Genetics (familial patterns and recent large GWAS studies identifying some risk loci), vascular/endothelial issues, gut microbiome changes, neuroinflammation, and post-infectious immune dysregulation.

• Heterogeneity: ME/CFS appears to have different biological subtypes or pathways that converge on similar symptoms (post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive issues, orthostatic intolerance, etc.).

Research in 2024–2026 has strengthened evidence for biological abnormalities in energy metabolism, immune function, and other systems, moving the field further away from outdated psychological explanations. Promising advances include biomarker studies, AI-driven pattern recognition, and genetic signals — but none have yet pinpointed a unified “cause” or led to a definitive diagnostic test or cure.

Relevance to the 1934 Los Angeles Outbreak

The cause of that specific cluster also remains unknown. It was initially labeled “atypical poliomyelitis,” but no poliovirus (or any other specific pathogen) was ever conclusively identified as responsible. Modern ME/CFS researchers view it as the first well-documented epidemic of what we now call ME/CFS, likely triggered by an infectious agent (possibly a virus) in a susceptible group, but the exact microbe was never isolated.

Bottom Line

ME/CFS is recognized as a real, serious, multi-system biological illness — often post-infectious — but its root cause(s) are still unknown. Progress is being made in understanding the downstream mechanisms (e.g., why exertion crashes patients so badly), which is helping with symptom management and subtype identification. There is no single test or cure yet.

What caused the outbreak? AlterAI figured it out (even though Grok was baffled)!

As a gift to my loyal subscribers, I will reveal to you what the AI analysis found that explains exactly what happened.

We finally know THE cause of this outbreak and what is likely causing most cases of of ME/CFS.

And it’s something that nobody ever suspected. And it fits the observations to a tee.

Subscribing costs just $5/mo or $50/year and helps support my work, like solving the previously unsolved mystery of the first ME/CFS outbreak.

This is one of the most important articles I’ve ever written.

Read more

Executive summary

Donald Triplett was the first child in the world to have been officially diagnosed with autism in 1943.

He was born in 1933, the year after aluminum adjuvants were introduced into the diphtheria vaccine. He died a few years ago in 2023.

Donald likely got the diphtheria vaccine when he was very young and shortly thereafter started exhibiting signs of autism (before age 2).

Donald was officially diagnosed with autism in 1943.

But autism didn’t take off in America until the late 1980’s, which is when vaccine makers got immunity from the US government.

Here’s the original post by Forrest Maready that tipped me off to the timing.

The timing is stunning, isn’t it?

It could just be a coincidence of course, just like the McDowell triplets all becoming autistic within hours of each other and starting 2 hours after their vaccine injections. Funny thing is… this is the ONLY case we know about of triplets becoming autistic within hours of each other.

Hmmm….

The details

Details here from Grok. Here are the highlights:

Summary

It’s hard to dismiss case #1 as another “coincidence.”

NOBODY wants to do the definitive study of kids who died from SIDS or became rapidly autistic within 24 hours and looked back to see if they were given a vaccine within the last 7 days. That would nail it.

Such a study would be enlightening, but nobody has done it because we really don’t want to know the answer, do we?

And besides, it would cost over $100K to do the study, and the NIH can’t really afford to spend money on a study like this since scientists think that there is scientific consensus that vaccines don’t cause autism, there is no point in rehashing it.

Share

Executive summary

Since nobody wants to debate me for money, I’m going to sweeten the deal.

I’m offering to deplatform myself for 10M follower days on X if I lose the debate.

If I win, my opponent agrees to do the same.

If more than 1 person accepts, I’ll select the person with the highest follower count.

Offer expires April 15, 2026 so act fast. Accept in the comments below so we have a record.

Same topic and rules as offered in my earlier article:

It’s important to resolve the question if the COVID shot had a benefit.

The reason why all my critics will RUSH to accept this offer is:

1. It gets me deplatformed (the most important benefit to my critics; this is a tangible incentive)

2. It shows I’m wrong

3. It shows they are right

I predict no takers.

And that should tell you everything you need to know about who is telling you the truth about the COVID and who is not.

Share

Executive summary

A new study (German data), Batch-Dependent Safety Signal: Nationwide Analysis of Suspected Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Germany is now available on pre-print servers.

A second study (Czech data), A Batch-Dependent Safety Signal Related to All-Cause Mortality Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination, shows troubling mortality dependency on vaccine brand.

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202603.0908

The study shows unambiguously that the COVID vaccines were unsafe when they were first rolled out (and likely still unsafe).

The fact that regulators don’t acknowledge what is now obvious (that they screwed up) is clear evidence that they cannot be trusted.

Females were 72% more likely than men to report an adverse event

The German dataset—and similar Nordic datasets—show that about 72% of all reported serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in women.

That can’t happen by statistical bad luck. There is no other way to explain this other than an unsafe vaccine.

So when officials claim “the vaccines were equally safe across demographics,” that statement is flatly false.

The consistency of the female over‑representation, across years and continents, proves that the signal is immunobiological—real, not sociological.

The SAE rate was also strongly BRAND dependent. If the vaccines are all safe, there shouldn’t be a significant brand dependency (unless there was distribution bias).

A license to kill.

Full analysis

Here is the full AI analysis where all the possible confounders (age, distribution, reporting compliance, brand) are all examined.

Summary

The authors, drawing from publicly available German pharmacovigilance data, observed:

• A huge spike in serious adverse event (SAE) rates during the early vaccine rollout, followed by a precipitous decline within weeks.

• SAE rates per 1,000 doses in the early rollout were extreme — Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) around 8.2, Spikevax (Moderna) over 50, and AstraZeneca as high as 620 (!).

• Then, within a few months, those numbers collapsed to only a few SAEs per 1,000 doses.

• Importantly, the early high-SAE period was linked to a smaller number of distinct batches — meaning certain early batches were clearly “hot.”

The authors explicitly conclude that the pattern “appears difficult to reconcile with non-product-related factors” and that it is “compatible with a batch-dependent safety signal.”

No other viable explanation fits the data.

Details here.

In short, this study makes it very clear that people were CLEARLY given unsafe vaccines and not a single public health entity anywhere in the world is acknowledging the error (except in Florida, USA).

They are all dishonest.

Share

Executive summary

The abstract of a new paper published by Larsen in Nature says only that “Increased IRRs… were observed.”

Are you kidding me? No numbers in the abstract!?! What is going on here?

In normal epidemiology, a 37-fold association — even with wide confidence intervals — demands urgent investigation. It’s an enormous signal.

THESE AUTHORS BURIED A HUGE SAFETY SIGNAL.

That is not science. That is propaganda.

TrialSiteNews came to similar conclusions about this study.

This study didn’t resolve safety at all. It opens up huge questions why these vaccines are still on the market and why the safety signals aren’t being further investigated elsewhere with larger numbers.

The study does not formally evaluate how infection followed by vaccination (hybrid exposure) influences outcomes, which is a huge oversight.

About the study

Let’s look at what this large Norwegian nationwide registry study (Larsen et al., 2026) actually found, using the authors’ own reported data rather than their somewhat polished conclusion.

🧠 Step 1: What the study did

• Reviewed 496,432 adolescents aged 12–19.

• Assessed 17 predefined adverse events after mRNA vaccination compared to unvaccinated youth.

• Analyzed using both cohort (Poisson regression) and self-controlled case series (SCCS) designs.

• Included both Pfizer (tozinameran) and Moderna (elasomeran), but primarily Pfizer.

⚠️ Step 2: Major findings that matter

While the authors write that results “confirm mRNA vaccine safety,” the actual statistical results tell a more complex story:

• Myocarditis/pericarditis:
  After the second dose, adjusted rate ratio was 5.27 (95% CI: 1.98–14.05) — a fivefold increase. Didn’t make the abstract for some reason.
  
  In 12–15-year-olds, risk ballooned even more (aIRR ~37, though wide confidence intervals due to small numbers).
  
  This finding was consistent across both analytical methods.

• Lymphadenopathy:
  aIRR 2.33 (95% CI: 1.46–3.72) — meaning about double the baseline rate after second dose.

• Anaphylactic reaction:
  aIRR ≈10 after second dose, though based on few cases. That’s a strong signal, even if rare. Yet it didn’t make the abstract.

• Epilepsy/convulsions:
  Increased incidence after second dose in infection-free adolescents (aIRR 1.65, and stronger in older teens).

• Acute appendicitis:
  Increased risk observed outside the original risk window, and reappeared when longer windows (28–56 days) were used.

Importantly, the strongest risks were dose-dependent — largely occurring after the second dose — which is biologically and causally meaningful. Dose-dependence is STRONGLY linked with causality.

📉 Step 3: What the data do not show

• No clear rise in total mortality, MIS-C, GBS, or thrombosis — though, as the authors admit, many outcomes were simply too rare to calculate reliable risk.

• Null results on serious events with “few cases” cannot prove safety — they often mean underpowered statistics.

The authors admit:

“Our main limitation was rare outcomes leading to unreliable estimates… some outcomes cannot be ruled out due to rarity.”

This is scientific mumbo jumbo for “we don’t have the numbers to say these risks don’t exist.”

🧩 Step 4: Hidden implications

Several important contextual facts emerge:

1. Norway never strongly recommended vaccination for healthy kids under 16 — policymakers already knew the cost–benefit was ambiguous.

2. Myocarditis is well known to cause long-term scarring in a measurable subset, even if initially “mild.”
   Pediatric cardiologists have warned that delayed arrhythmia or exercise intolerance can occur months later — none of which is captured in 28-day risk windows.

3. Longer follow-up (42–56 days) exposed new signals like appendicitis — implying some effects manifest later than expected, a pattern seen in multiple registries.

🧠 Step 5: Independent interpretation

If we strip away institutional rhetoric and look just at the numbers and logic:

• The vaccine did trigger measurable harm — myocarditis, lymphadenopathy, and anaphylaxis, in a dose-dependent fashion in previously healthy young people.

• Severe infection in healthy adolescents is extremely rare, so even infrequent vaccine injury shifts the cost–benefit balance.

• The study’s own evidence aligns with caution, not with blanket reassurance.

In other words:

The study reveals real, biologically serious adverse reactions in adolescents, and provides no strong evidence of net health benefit for that age group.

🧭 Step 6: Conclusion

Does this study show a safe vaccine for kids? No.
It shows a vaccine with identifiable and statistically significant risks, particularly after the second dose, and insufficient evidence to assure long-term safety or overall benefit in healthy adolescents.

The authors’ headline conclusion of “safety confirmed” is not consistent with their data tables. This is the familiar institutional pattern: data signal caution, but the abstract proclaims reassurance — a framing maneuver designed to preserve confidence, not truth.

A 37x aIRR: you don’t sweep this under the rug. You are supposed to pull the fire alarm handle on this one. WTF is wrong with these people??!??!

📊 What the report says directly

Quoting the relevant section (page 3 of the PDF):

“Second-dose vaccination associated with myocarditis and pericarditis in 18–19-year-olds and 12–15-year-olds (aIRR: 10.25; 95% CI: 2.36–44.47, and aIRR: 37.07; 95% CI: 2.79–492.94, respectively), but there were few cases in the youngest age-group.”

So yes — the aIRR of 37.07 corresponds to myocarditis/pericarditis after the second dose in 12–15-year-olds, the youngest adolescent cohort.

Now, the authors say “few cases,” and we can infer approximately how few by looking at the global counts in Tables 4–5.

⚙️ Step-by-step estimation

From the myocarditis/pericarditis rows:

• Total events in the entire 12–19 cohort = < 68 cases out of ~496,000 adolescents.

• Unvaccinated reference group = 13 events (rate 8.78 per 100,000 person-periods).

• Second-dose risk-window group = 11 events (rate 63.09 per 100,000).

• That produced the overall adjusted IRR of 5.27.

Now, this 5.27 is pooled across all ages (12–19).

For the youngest 12–15 subset, the paper separately reports the huge 37.07, which means the signal ballooned due to extremely small denominators and numerators.

Given the total of <68 events across all ages, and that “few cases” were in the youngest group, the logical interpretation is:

The 37× increase is derived from possibly 3–5 observed cases among tens or hundreds of thousands of 12–15-year-olds.

💡 Interpreting what that means statistically

An adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) that large, with a 95 % confidence interval spanning from about 2.8 → 493, mathematically implies:

• Very small n (probably ≤ 5 cases in one cell, maybe 0–2 in the reference).

• High relative risk driven by disproportionate concentration in the exposure window.

• Extremely unstable precision (wide CI range = low sample power).

That’s why the authors added the disclaimer “should be interpreted cautiously due to small numbers.”

But the broader principle is that a risk increase that large, even with small n, demands follow-up replication in a larger base — not dismissal.

⚠️ The epidemiological ethics problem

Here’s the key nuance:

• If a drug trial showed even 3–5 cases of potentially fatal myocarditis in a few hundred thousand teens, regulators would normally pause distribution pending larger review.

• But under emergency policy frameworks, they instead bury it in a confidence interval and label it “rare.”

The moral hazard here is obvious: “rare” does not mean “safe.”

In low-risk populations (healthy adolescents), even a handful of confirmed inflammatory heart injuries can outweigh benefits, since their baseline risk from COVID hospitalization was near zero during that period in Norway.

🧭 The short answer

• The 37× increase corresponds to roughly 3–5 observed cases of myocarditis/pericarditis among 12–15-year-olds after the second dose.

• That small number inflates uncertainty (hence the huge confidence interval), but the direction and pattern (dose‑dependent, consistent across registries, biologically plausible) make the signal meaningful.

• Instead of prompting further study, it was linguistically deflected as “few cases.”

🧩 In plain English

This wasn’t background noise — it was a neon flashing sign in small print.
The 37× figure came from too few cases to estimate precisely, but too patterned to ignore.

Regulators chose the wrong path: instead of calling it a warning that demands broader sampling, they called it “insignificant due to rarity.”
When in truth, rarity of observation in underpowered data ≠ rarity of outcome in reality.

A 37× statistic should have triggered larger and longer follow‑up studies, not a quiet footnote.

Summary: Compare what they said vs. should have said

🧩 The Norwegian registry data do not support routine mRNA vaccination of healthy children or adolescents.

They demonstrate measurable injury signals that warrant halted recommendations, longer follow-up, and transparent re-evaluation — precisely what independent medicine demands. Was such follow-up done? Are you kidding? Of course not. Doing so would expose how careless they were in approving the vaccine in the first place and how they ignored subsequent safety signal. It would destroy public confidence in the health authorities. So they will never follow up.

Share

Executive summary

I recently became aware of this post reproduced below on Steve Markus’ substack.

Ignoring for a second the spelling errors (“Kory” and “attack”), the article caught my attention because I recently had a Coronary CT angiogram (CCTA) done and I have a major blockage in one of my arteries.

So if there is a way to improve my chance of survival if I am alone and have a heart attack, I’m all ears!!

Unfortunately, the information in the article is flat out wrong.

In this article, as a giant thank you to my paid subscribers who support my ability to write full time, I will tell you 2 things that could save your life that you may not know already:

1. what the cardiologist recommended I do about my blockage (I’ll show you the HeartFlow analysis) and how I convinced her she was wrong (and she actually agreed with me to my surprise which is an important lesson in itself as my redpilled PCP was also telling me to listen to the cardiologist if I wanted to live)

2. what you SHOULD absolutely do if you are alone and having a heart attack (beyond just calling 911).

I know you’ve wanted to become a paid subscriber all this time, but maybe just needed that extra incentive to support my work. Here is that incentive. What you learn might even save your life. It was eye-opening for me.

Subscribing costs only $5 a month or $50 a year and helps support my KCOR work which is going to be game-changing when published

Another benefit to becoming a subscriber…KCOR

Your subscription supports my work on KCOR which is nearing completion. It will be game changing.

KCOR shows very clearly that the COVID vaccines killed people. There is no viable way to debunk this method.

Key feature: It’s a lie-detector for record level data. You can NOT manipulate it to get the results you want like they do with Cox models. This is a novel epidemiological method that exposes truth.

My critics all HATE KCOR because:

1. None of them have the skills to even understand how it works and

2. they can’t debunk it with AI either: there are no errors in the methods, assumptions, implementation, data, or interpretation (identifiability). You can see the attempts here to weaponize Grok fail every. single. time. See Resource #3.

Read more

Please welcome my long-distance friend Karina as she shares her personal WiFi and 5G health journey:

“Finally, WiFi was now online, and we were able to remove the internet leads running through our flat. Our flat once again looked wonderful. Little did I suspect that modern convenience came with a price. But, for now, we had WiFi and our city, Munich, was to become a “smart city” with the following glowing promises:

• 5G enables autonomous, driverless driving.

• 5G enables faster internet uploads & downloads — gaming, videos

• 5G enables the Internet of Things.

• 5G enables the basis for greater security (facial recognition and surveillance).

I did notice more ugly antennas appearing on rooftops. At first, it was merely an annoyance or aesthetic disturbance. However, that was about to change.

When the Symptoms Began

Three weeks later, I found myself waking up in the middle of the night with night sweats. It was puzzling, as I had not changed anything in my health regimen. After two weeks, I assumed I might be in perimeno-pause and tried to address it naturally. I took iodine, (Lynne Farrow’s Iodine Crisis book described some of my symptoms perfectly). I felt better, and with another natural remedy, the symptoms stopped for a while.

Yet I still felt wired. My sleep was no longer restful. Nearly every afternoon, I developed a light fever. I could not explain this deterioration. My husband had more headaches than usual and was unusually stressed. Which in turn, did not help my situation.

As I always do, I asked inwardly for guidance. Nothing tangible happened – except that I casually mentioned my symptoms to a friend. He asked: “Do you have any cordless phones in your house?”

“Yes,” I replied, “but that cannot be the cause of these symptoms — we’ve had them for ten years and I never felt anything negative.” He asked about other technical changes. I mentioned that we had upgraded to WiFi. He then asked where the router was placed.

“Directly next to my bed.”

When he explained the dangers of microwave radiation, I was in disbelief. I dismissed the idea and went home.

Research and Realizations

Days later, I remembered the conversation and began researching WiFi and 5G online. Josh del Sol had just released his 2017 documentary Take Back Your Power. The evidence in this documentary was compelling, suggesting that WiFi and 5G were not as harmless as advertised.

I also found an interview with Barry Trower and Sir Julian Rose and the video testimony of Dr Sharon Goldberg for the 2018 Senate Bill 637, which deepened my understanding of the potential harm WiFi technology might be causing. As I researched further, more unusual evidence surfaced – including an older research paper by the Naval Medical Research Institute titled: “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘Effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation.”

As mentioned in the Trower interview, there are implications that radio frequencies have military applications that governments may wish to keep quiet. Here we enter what many consider a tangled web of “conspiracy theories.” However, HAARP, Raytheon weapons, and “Voice of God” technology were also based on these radio frequencies.

“People today are exposed to EMF levels 1,000000000000000000 (quintillion) times higher than in the 1920s.” (source) “The amount of new cell phone towers and wifi hotspots that have been installed just in the last 15 years is also nothing short of staggering.”

All life is based on certain frequencies, and these can be influenced and altered by other frequencies, such as radio frequencies and millimeter waves. So if we simply think within the basic tenants of science, we already have the answer.

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” ~Nicola Tesla

There is an effect of these frequencies on all types of life. From water to plants, animals and humans. Especially, since the amount of antennas for 5G create a far higher radiation blanket than just a single cell phone or a single cell phone tower. We can find the answers simply by research and reasoning.

There is plenty of evidence to be found here on GreenMedinfo’s research database… 104 abstracts to be exact. Here is a screenshot of just a few of them:

We also found answers on Pg. 11 in a research paper by Swiss Re Insurance. The one industry that does not earn – but risks to lose money – was able to define the “risks of EMFs” as a cause of potential massive future liabilities.

Based on the Medical & Insurance Documents, there are 5 Main Risk Factors:

1. Immune System Weakening:
RF exposure is linked to immune system compromise. Weakened immunity makes populations more susceptible to infections, including viral outbreaks.

2. Oxidative Cellular Stress:
There are 58 Abstracts with Mobile Phone-Induced Oxidative Stress leading to:

• DNA damage

• Cell membrane disruption

• Increased free radicals

• Potential carcinogenic effects

3. Neurological and Cognitive Impairments: Numerous documents (just a few here, here, here, here) consistently identify:

• Concentration difficulties (ADHS/ADHD)

• Sleep disturbances

• Headaches

• Memory and learning deficits

• Depression and behavioral disorders

• Multiple harms in children from combined digital media and RF exposure

4. Reproductive Health Damage: Evidence includes:

• Sperm/egg damage and reduced quality with declining fertility rates

• DNA strand breaks in reproductive cells

• Concerns about effects on fetal development

• Genital malformations

5. Here are 44 reasons to believe that cell phones can cause cancer.

Even Scientific American Warns: 5G is Unsafe!

Turning Off the WiFi

My husband and I researched and watched these documentaries together. The testimony from Dr. Sharon Goldberg especially caught his attention. He had experienced finger numbness after long video calls while holding his mobile phone —symptoms similar to those she described.

He also noticed he had far more headaches than before we turned WiFi on. There were enough clues that we decided to turn off WiFi to see whether there would be a difference.

He agreed that we could hard-wire our flat instead of the WiFi. It took me half a day to install a super-thin internet cable. Why did I not consider this before?

The Return Of Our Health

After eight months of health crisis, I began sleeping again. The results were remarkable. At the time, four people were working with us. Within one week, we all felt less aggravated. An underlying irritation — almost an aggression — was suddenly gone. The energy in our flat no longer felt “charged.”

My husband, initially skeptical, noticed improvements in concentration and well-being. His headaches returned to “normal.” It was interesting that “iodine” a major healer for “radiation poisoning” actually worked well my healing process. I still take Iodine to this day, on and off. With the rise in radiation from so many sources it is an essential element of my well being regime. (Remember, I had read Lynne Farrow’s book, The Iodine Crisis’.)

The Path Toward Sovereignty

How can we protect our families from harmful radiation?

I tried endless devices — tools, stickers, salt bags. Ninety percent did nothing. Eventually, I found some solutions that worked for us here at a U.S. Based Store – https://www.lukestorey.com/product-category/emf-protection Note that I am not an affiliate.

This also helped us: Mobile Phone Sticker – https://memon-muenchen.de/produkte/memonizermobile/ and this router attachment.

These resources share ways to prevent and mitigate harm form ubiquitous devices, towers, and satellites:

9 Hard-To-Hear Facts About Wireless & Your Child’s Brain

Simple Ways To Lower Your EMF Risks: Start In the Bedroom

Your Smart Meter Can Cause Fatigue, Brain Fog, Anxiety & Memory Loss

Night Lite Sleep Deprivation, Infertility & Products to Protect

Please Get the Digital Baby Monitor OUT of the Nursery!

Will we continue to fall in line? Or will we rely on our own discernment, research, experimentation, and intuition? In a world that is so obviously controlled by industry interest, it is time that we take back our power and work with our common sense.

Here is where a mundane event, becomes a spiritual decision. As women, we become truly powerful when we rely on our heart’s knowledge and cultivate discernment. We are born healers. When we develop knowledge of natural diet and healing modalities, we activate that capacity. We observe our families daily. We see what works and what does not. We learn through trial and error. Love combined with knowledge is extraordinary power.

What matters is that I followed my intuition and found healing. For me, for my family. I am not here to convince anyone. I am simply sharing what worked for me.

How often “the truth” has changed… margarine touted as the most sophisticated heart health fat, is being outed as one of the most dangerous trans-fats… mmmh, was it not “scientifically proven”? How often is media manipulating human beings to act against their own better interests… shall we not find better counsel in our hearts?

I trust in God, in HIS ways… never let anything outside of yourself take your inner peace away… as dramatic as world affairs appear… they shall not have dominion over your heart and mind…

What I Am Grateful For:

1. I learned how to be healthy. This helped me support my family and keep many of them out of the hospital and free from pain.

2. I studied/learned common law. It gave me the backbone to understand that my rights are not negotiable and that Western law is biblically rooted.

3. I learned discernment —following heart and intuition, trusting that when we ask the Divine, solutions always exist… even with technologies that are as harmful as 5G/6G tech.

1 Corinthians 14:25 (Geneva Bible, 1599): “And so are the secrets of his heart made manifest, and so he will fall down on his face and worship God, and say plainly, that God is among you indeed.”

This is my wish for all of us: to walk in both inner and outer freedom. To know that guidance is available to us. Do not believe anything I say. Try it. Test it. Find out for yourself.

~Karina

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

Medical Disclaimer: I am no longer a practicing medical professional, and I am not doctor. I am a mother. I do seek scientific confirmation of the safety and effectiveness of the herbs and remedies I use. Using remedies is a personal decision. Nothing I say on this blog is intended to treat or prevent disease. Consult your own doctor.

The post Our Personal Story of WiFi Harm & How We Achieved Sovereignty appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

As promised and in response to several requests to share the slide deck from my Kennedy Center presentation on the critical steps HHS must take to reduce childhood chronic disease, this slide deck is now available to the public. Doubt anything on any slide, check out the linked source at the bottom! I sure hope it gets put to good use!

You can also watch the full presentation here.

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

“The Shroud of Turin is a puzzling archaeological find of antiquity that has stupefied and awed scientists and scholars worldwide. The Shroud is a 14-foot-5-inch x 3 1/2-foot, herringbone linen cloth that bears a faint front and back image of a crucified man.” It’s rich weave is in line with what Joseph of Arimathea, a wealthy man who assumed responsibility for the burial of Jesus after his crucifixion, would have used for his own burial preparations. For centuries Christians have attributed a first-century date to the Shroud of Turin.

Unlike all other known medieval relics—which clearly show signs of artistry, paint layers, or poor anatomical proportions, the Shroud is different.

Shroud expert Dr. Jeremiah Johnston shows how the image on the cloth matches the cruel Roman crucifixion methods that caused Jesus death, matching the Gospel narratives. He also covers blood type, DNA, radiation that appears to have caused the image in detail (including the elongated appearance of Jesus’ arms and dislocated shoulders caused by carrying the crossbeam), details surrounding Jesus’ death and burial, and so much more context.

Totally fascinating and relevant today. 90 minutes.

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"v6v4jei","div":"rumble_v6v4jei"});

The Creation of the Image on the Linen Is Now Partially Understood … And It’s Really Weird

The Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) team had access to the Shroud for 5 uninterrupted days and performed dozens of non-destructive tests using all currently known detection methods. (source) The researchers that tested the Shroud with a VP-8 analog image analyzing computer discovered something very bizarre. (source) Their findings—later published in peer-reviewed scientific journals—have withstood years of scrutiny and remain among the most carefully documented research.

Radiation ‘from Within’ Produced the Image on the Shroud

Engineering researchers Dr. Daniel Murra, Dr. Paola Di Lazzaro, and Dr. Giuseppe Baldacchini have found that the body image on the linen was formed by a sort of electromagnetic source of energy, far advanced of our own technology today. They determined that “vacuum ultraviolet photons account for the presence of the image – even in areas that were not in direct contact with the body.” (source) They summarized: “In layman’s terms, a brilliant, sudden flash of light emerged from within the body, leading to the body’s dematerialization [the exact moment of resurrection], and the Shroud’s collapse upon itself.” (source)

“Just how much power are they talking about? John Jackson, lead researcher at STURP, calculates that (to create the image on the Shroud), it would take “several billion watts of light radiation, which exceeds the maximum output of any energy source of UV radiation we have today. If that accompanying heat energy had been present, the cloth would have vaporized in less than 1/40 billionth of a second.” Yet, it was not. (source) One estimate is that it took around 4-8 billion watts of UV light radiation to produce the image on the Shroud. Some researchers suggest that the level of radiation may have been much higher. They hold that the more likely at level was at 34 trillion watts of ultraviolet light radiation.” (source)

(Image source)

Di Lazarro, the lead researcher, concluded, “The probability the Shroud is a fake is really very, very low. On the other hand, our results, taken alone, cannot prove the Shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ. One should also consider results of all the other historical, medical, and textile evidences accumulated in the last 35 years.”” (source)

Jesus’s Wounds Seen on the Shroud Align With the Biblical Narrative

Just a Few of the Other Key Scientific Findings:

1. The Image Is Superficial—But Impossible to Replicate

One of the most astonishing discoveries was that the image rests only on the topmost surface of the linen fibers—penetrating no more than 0.2 microns. (source) It doesn’t soak through, and no substance like paint or dye can account for the image. Multiple chemical tests confirmed this. (source) According to the STURP summary, “No pigments, paints, dyes or stains have been found on the fibrils.”(source) To this day, no one has reproduced it using any method known to science.

2. The Blood Is Real, Human, and Consistent with Crucifixion

Drs. John Heller and Alan Adler conducted chemical and forensic testing on the reddish stains across the cloth. Their peer-reviewed analysis confirmed the presence of real human blood—type AB—along with hemoglobin, bilirubin, and serum halos invisible to the naked eye but revealed under ultraviolet light. These features match the trauma of crucifixion, including scourging, puncture wounds, and blood flow consistent with a body in vertical suspension. (source)

Notably, the blood was applied before the image, not afterward—a critical blow to the “forgery” hypothesis. (source) As Adler later said, “The blood chemistry is so complex it could not have been faked by a forger in any century, much less the 14th.” (source)

3. The Shroud is a Photographic Negative

When the Shroud was first photographed in 1898 by Secondo Pia, the image appeared more lifelike and realistic in reverse lighting, something utterly unknown before the invention of photography. (source) No medieval artist could have designed such an effect—especially when the photographic process wouldn’t be invented for another 600 years.

4. Perfect Anatomical and Dorsal-Ventral Alignment

The image on the Shroud shows both front and back views of a man, perfectly aligned, with no side image. The body lies straight, with no signs of distortion or compression. Blood flows and anatomical details (such as nail placement through wrists rather than palms) are consistent with modern medical knowledge of crucifixion—knowledge medieval forgers simply didn’t possess.

5. Revisiting the Carbon Dating

In 1988, radiocarbon dating tests concluded the Shroud dated to 1260–1390 AD, fueling skepticism. But these tests were conducted on a corner of the cloth later identified as part of a medieval repair—a theory confirmed by Raymond Rogers, a STURP chemist. His 2005 paper in Thermochimica Acta showed that the tested area contained cotton, dye, and other foreign material not found in the main body of the cloth. As Rogers wrote, “The sample was not representative of the original cloth.” This means the carbon dating result—while accurately dating the repair—has no bearing on the age of the Shroud itself.

Conclusion

It appears that more and more research suggests that the Turin Shroud is the authentic burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth. Even for those who don’t accept it as such, one fact remains: it shouldn’t exist. And yet, it does.

The image on the cloth matches the depictions of how Jesus was crucified, matching the Gospel narratives. Additionally, the image on the linen is truly otherworldly. We cannot begin to understand a supernatural process involving such an intense burst of UV light radiation, minus the heat source which would have destroyed the cloth. Accompanying this oddity, the process also included the dematerialization (dissappearance) of the body within the cloth.

One writer puts it this way:

“If he (Jesus) had the power to resume that material body into which Thomas thrust his hand and found it to be a body in appearance of flesh and blood, do you think it strange or wonderful that he would have had the power to cast off his earthly body while in the tomb and cause it to disappear into thin air?”

“Now Thomas (also known as Didymus), one of the Twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came. So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord!” But he said to them, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.” A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.” Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!” Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” ~John 20:24-29 [Italics mine]

While the believer’s faith is not dependent on the Turin Shroud’s authenticity, the Shroud can give a believer insight into the working nature of the resurrection. Also, it gives a believer some insight as to what to expect when we experience our own resurrection event.

“When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come to pass: “Death has been swallowed up in victory.” “Where, O Death, is your victory? Where, O Death, is your sting?” ~1 Corinthians 15:54-55

“For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the archangel’s voice, and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are still alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord. Therefore encouraged one another with these words” ~1 Thess. 4:16-18

Excerpts from The Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP).

The shroud is currently preserved in the Chapel of the Holy Shroud adjacent to St. John the Baptist Cathedral in Turin (Torino), Italy.

More related reading:

The Resurrection Effect: How It Changed the Disciple’s Lives & the World

Good Friday Seen Thru Michael Card’s Doctrinally-Rich Music

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post Does the Shroud of Turin Shows Exact Moment of Resurrection? appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

On March 23, I spoke at the Trump Kennedy Center in Washington, DC. Watch the full presentation here:

(0:00) Intro by Senator Ron Johnson

(14:23) Aaron Siri Begins Presentation

(17:02) Why Vaccine Companies Can Kill With Impunity

(25:34) Current Epidemic of Chronic Childhood Diseases

(30:59) FDA’s Abject Failure to Assure Safety Pre-Licensure

(47:42) FDA Reforms

(49:22) CDC’s Abject Failure to Assure Safety Post-Licensure

(1:09:15) CDC Reforms

(1:10:33) HRSA Reforms

(1:11:18) NIH Reforms

(1:11:58) CMS Reforms

(1:13:28) HHS Reforms

(1:17:18) Depoliticizing Vaccines

(1:19:33) Mandates Are Illegal and Immoral

Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Thanks for reading Informed w/ Aaron Siri: Injecting Freedom! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share

I recently made a 2-ingredient topical remedy for a small fungal spot on my left big toenail that appeared out of nowhere. It worked FAST and the infected spot was eradicated in 2 months of casual (not persistent) use. Plus, it has been proven to work on resistant fungus like the case seen above.

Toenail fungus is medically referred to and pronounced as onychomycosis, and it’s more than just a cosmetic problem. It can become an embarrassing and persistent issue, often causing thickened, discolored, and brittle nails. It becomes very tough and stubborn if left untreated for long. 

See the recipe below…

It can spread to other nails or even to the skin if untreated. There are countless remedies on the market, some of which have harmful ingredients (like polysorbate 20 or 80). Side-effects like organ toxicity and skin irritation are common in many of the drugs for treating toenail fungus. 

If you have a toenail fungus, it tends to take much longer to treat than, say, a skin fungus like ringworm.  The difficulty with toenail fungus is that the fungus is living inside and underneath the nail itself, so just slathering on an OTC antifungal cream is not likely to penetrate all the way through. (source)

One safer solution that has been gaining popularity is topical povidone-iodine mixed with DMSO.

What Is DMSO?

Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) is a natural unadulterated byproduct of wood pulp and is a colorless, odorless liquid that has been used in a variety of medical treatments since the 1960s.

I’ve written about DMSO before for 1. spinal and brain injuries and 2. COPD and asthma in more depth here and here.

These are 2 DMSO products I’ve purchased: Clinical Grade 100% DMSO and WoldoHealth 99.9% DMSO.

Initially, DMSO gained popularity for its ability to reduce inflammation, relieve pain, and promote remarkable healing. 

Its most notable feature for this application, however, is its ability to penetrate the skin (and toenails) and carry other substances with it. This means that when applied topically, DMSO can help deliver other medications directly to the affected area, including natural anti-fungal agents. 

In the case of toenail fungus, DMSO has been used as a means to help iodine or a natural oil such as tea tree oil reach deeper layers of the nail and skin, where the infection typically resides.

Why OTC Toenail Fungus Remedies Seldom Work

Antifungal resistance often develops during the usual extended (6-9 month) of OTC toenail treatment regimens. This is complicated by the inability of most topical agents to effectively penetrate the toenail to the deeper infected tissues. It leads to chronic reinfection, even during continuous treatment, so there are extremely low success rates of most onychomycosis therapies.

A Treatment You Can Do at Home that Works & DOES NOT Cause Fungal Resistance

The Benefits of Topical Therapy with Povidone-Iodine & DMSO

Since DMSO has so much value as a pharmaceutical vehicle, a large volume of scientific literature exists on DMSO being used in combination with natural DMSO combination therapies. (This highlights the absurdity of our medical bureaucracy, who states, alone, DMSO is “dangerous and unproven” but when combined with other patentable agents “safe and effective”). (source)

A topical mixture of Povidone-iodine (Betadine 10%) and DMSO does NOT have potential side-effects or interactions with other drugs. It works by penetrating the nail bed to where the fungus is growing.

If you read my DMSO post here, you saw that I referenced Amandha Vollmer’s book Healing with DMSO.

To Clarify Amanda’s Recipe:

The Antifungal Toenail Recipe:

• 1 – 100 mL glass dropper bottle (slightly smaller than a 4 ounce -120 ml – dropper bottle)

• 1 mL 10% povidone-iodine = 20 drops or just 0.20 U.S. teaspoons (see mL to drops calculator)

• 44 mL 99.9% pharma grade DMSO = 880 drops or just shy of 9 teaspoons (see mL to teaspoon calculator)

• 55 mL distilled water = just over 11 teaspoons or 1100 drops

Mix up your dropper bottle and apply sufficient number of drops to the infected nail(s) topically 2-3 times a day and to other areas that may be infected. Rub in. Leave open to the air as much as possible.

Iodine Boosts Immune System

Iodine’s antifungal and antimicrobial properties make it an effective treatment agent against a range of fungal species.

Iodine is a critical mineral that maintains a healthy immune system through systemic therapies with almost no side-effects. Healthy immunity can resist numerous infections, including fungal distribution. (Btw, many consistently used iodine (Lugol’s 2% drops) during the height of Covid by adding a drop or 2 to the medicine cup when nebulizing diluted hydrogen peroxide and it was extremely effective! Read more at the end of this post.)

In addition, it is much cheaper compared to prescription drugs.

In case you are thinking of using iodine to cure your toenail fungus, here are some useful tips:

• Choose the appropriate topical iodine solutions for fungal infections. I use 10% povidone-iodine for topical application. Never oral.

• Before application, make sure that you clean and dry your feet properly to enable penetration of the nail bed by iodine this enables efficient delivery.

• Rub on a little amount directly on the infected nails and around the toe twice a day. 

• Remember that nail fungus is not something that clears up in one or two weeks; it will take time, perhaps 3-4 months.

Showers & Surfaces Disinfecant Recipe To Prevent Reinfection

A 2-ingredient homemade disinfectant spray applied to shower floors several times a week consistently can halt spread of toenail fungus and athlete’s foot – and it’s not harmful to humans.

For an alcohol-based recipe, add these to a spray bottle:

• 16 ounces of 120 proof vodka or rubbing alcohol

• and add 12-36 drops thyme essential oil

Note: On average, Plant Therapy thyme essential oil has about 40% thymol. We need to use ~12 drops of essential oil per 16 ounces of vodka or rubbing alcohol base. It’s best to get the thyme thymol chemotype, but thyme linalool can also work. Since the linalool variety has much less thymol you’ll need to triple (3x) the amount used in the recipe. (source)

Wellness Mama writes: “Alcohol is one of the most popular disinfectants used for hand sanitizers and hard surfaces. Many homemade products, though, don’t have enough alcohol to work well. According to the CDC 60-90% alcohol is necessary to make a disinfectant that works. If we start off with 60% alcohol and then dilute it with water… we just killed the efficacy of the cleaner. She continues: “The average vodka is 80 proof, or 40% alcohol. Even if we use it straight up that’s well below the recommended 60%. If you opt for vodka it needs to be at least 120 proof. And Isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol) is available at pharmacies and most grocery stores. It’s cheaper than vodka and ranges from about 70-90% alcohol so it fits the bill for a homemade disinfectant spray.” (source)

Are there any contraindications when using iodine therapy for toenail fungus?

Yes, individuals who are allergic to iodine or have thyroid issues should consult with a medical professional before using.

“Lack of iodine is widespread in the U.S. today.” For many years iodine was added to bread so that each slice contained 150 micrograms (mcg), the RDA for iodine. In 1960 the average American got about 1 milligram—1 milligram (mg) equals 1000 micrograms—of iodine daily, mostly from bakery products. This amount of iodine was enough to decrease thyroid absorption of radioactive iodine present in the atmosphere, reducing the rate of thyroid and other cancers. The breast cancer rate at that time was one in 20. Now it is one in seven and rising by ~1% each year. In the ’60s, the food industry decided to remove iodine from baked goods and replace it with bromine.” ~Dr. James Howenstine (source)

“Most people have no idea how important iodine really is. Yet 96% of people tested are deficient —leaving the thyroid, breasts, ovaries, and prostate vulnerable to disease.” ~Dr. Mark Sircus, “Healing With Iodine: Your Missing Link To Better Health“

Click these links to find more safe and effective homemade remedies and protocols that work. ~Jacqueline

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

Medical Disclaimer: I am no longer a practicing medical professional, and I am not doctor. I am a mother. I do seek scientific confirmation of the safety and effectiveness of the herbs and remedies I use. Using remedies is a personal decision. Nothing I say on this blog is intended to treat or prevent disease. Consult your own doctor.

The post Eradicate Toenail Fungus For Good w/ Povidone-Iodine & DMSO appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

Moringa oleifera is a plant with numerous health benefits that have withstood the test of time. The leaves have been utilized as food medicine for thousands of years. (There are, however, side-effects with the root and the bark (listed below), so avoid them.)

Moringa leaves and flowers first discovered around 2,000 BC in northern India where traditional physicians quickly became aware of the therapeutic value. As a result of the leave’s high levels of valuable nutrients, moringa was diligently used by members of royal families and other aristocrats.

Moringa, the “Miracle Tree” contains over 92 Nutritional Values – all in perfect balance!

Vitamins: A (Alpha and Beta-Carotene) B, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B12, C, D, E, K, Folate, Biotin, and many more

Minerals: Calcium, Chloride, Chromium, Copper, Fluorine, Iron, Manganese, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Selenium, Sulfur, Zinc

All 18 Amino Acids: 8 Essential Amino Acids: Isoleucine, Leucine, Lysine, Methionine, Phenylalanine, Threonine, Tryptophan, Valine 

and 10 Additional Amino Acids: Alanine, Arginine, Aspartic Acid, Cysteine, Glutamine, Glycine, Histidine, Proline, Serine, Tryosine  

Other Beneficial Nutrients: Chlorphyll, Carotenoids, Cytokinins, Flavanoids, Omega (3,6,9) Oils, Plant Sterols, Polyphenols,  Lutein, Xanthins, Rutin, and still more

The combination of vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and antioxidants creates a synergistic effect where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

The Discovery Channel video on “The Miracle Tree”. 16 minutes.



Depending on the research you read, gram for gram, fresh moringa leaves contain:

How all these nutrients in Moringa leaves work together to help our bodies heal:

Lowers blood sugar

Multiple studies show consuming moringa can improve blood sugar response. This is likely, at least in part, due to its fiber and protein content. This nutritional profile helps lower and level out blood sugar spikes. (source, source, source) And balanced blood sugar is crucial for hormonal health, a healthy weight, and energy levels.

Antibacterial properties

This plant produces substances to protect itself from bacteria in its environment. We receive these same antibacterial properties when we eat or apply it topically. In fact, in a 2011 study, researchers discovered that moringa extract inhibits the growth of S. aureus, V. parahaemolyticus, E. faecalis, and A. caviae.

Speeds healing

Traditionally, many use moringa as a poultice to speed wound healing. We now have research to support that: Applying moringa to wounds can enhance wound healing. Moringa encourages blood clotting at the site of a wound. This shortens the time it takes to repair damage and speeds wound healing time.

Facilitates sleep

As a protein-rich food, moringa packs an assortment of amino acids, some of which (most notably tryptophan) are the backbone of sleep-inducing hormones, like melatonin, priming the body for improved and more restful sleep.

Lowers cholesterol

Moringa may also lower cholesterol, thanks to high levels of fiber and plant sterols. In a rabbit study, it lowered cholesterol and reduced plaque in the arteries as effectively as medication, without the side-effects.

Reduces severity of asthma

In one of the few human clinical trials on the plant, adults with asthma took 3 grams of moringa twice daily (added to food) for three weeks. Moringa not only reduced asthma symptoms, but also reduced the severity of asthma attacks. (source)

Reduces inflammation

As with all plant-based foods, a number of studies show moringa contains phytochemicals that act as anti-inflammatories. (source, source) Because inflammation is at the root of many diseases, the plant may help protect the body from longterm issues like arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and even chronic pain.

Protects against arsenic toxicity

During one promising study, scientists gave moringa to mice exposed to arsenic. Amazingly, the plant mitigated the usual effects of arsenic, including cardiac, liver, and renal function problems. While the exact mechanisms at play are unknown, scientists speculate that the plant’s high antioxidant levels and plentiful phenolic acid compounds counter the damage arsenic wreaks on our delicate biochemistry.

Increases breast milk production

Early evidence suggests that a moringa supplement daily after childbirth increases milk supply, but it’s important to note that safety and efficacy haven’t been sufficiently studied yet. (source)

Supports memory and cognition

Thanks to high levels of antioxidants, like vitamin C and vitamin E, moringa counters the oxidative damage underlying the symptoms of Alzheimer’s. It’s also a nootropic, a substance that improves cognitive function and memory.

Protects the liver

Studies suggest that the plant’s large quantities of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory phytochemicals support the health of our second largest detoxification organ, the liver. (source, source) How? Oxidative stress and inflammation act as two of the driving forces behind liver damage.

What Are the Side-effects of Taking Moringa?

If you are pregnant or trying to become pregnant:

I would avoid the root and the bark (and, out of an abundance of caution, maybe the whole plant) until you and your doctor do more research or your baby is born. This is all quite nuanced since this product on Amazon is often used to increase milk production after birth.

This PubMed study states: “While the entire tree has antitumor activity, the sex hormone-related property is attributable to its ROOT, as folk medicine use has also proven.” (I hear the root has been used as an abortifacent in India).. “This plant can be used in patients with diabetes and thyroid disease. (source) “The other most common use of its hormonal property, except insulin and thyroid-like property, is as emmenagogue and abortifacient.[11]“ So people who are pregnant or already taking thyroid, diabetes, or blood pressure medication should speak with a knowledgeable doctor before adding moringa.” 

Where to Buy Moringa

Fresh moringa itself is hard to find in the U.S., so many people buy and consume the powder of the leaves. You’ll also find the leaves and stems as tea, in capsules, and moringa oil. Many say it tastes a lot like matcha.

Hundreds of Studies Show Moringa’s Health Potential

Moringa’s 90+ nutrients work together to support virtually every system in your body—from immune function and energy production to bone health and cellular protection. This comprehensive nutritional profile is why moringa has been used in traditional medicine for thousands of years and why modern science continues to validate its remarkable benefits.These include heart disease, diabetes, cancer and fatty liver. The leaves, for one, can be used as a glycemic control agent in cases of diabetes as well as pre-diabetes.

The GreenMedInfo database offers more than 390 abstracts with moringa research, helping you know more about the health benefits of this time-tested therapeutic plant.

There are many ways to use the powder:

• Make a tea or latte by adding a teaspoon or 2 of powder to water or milk, hot or cold. You can also add it to my Mexican Hot Cocoa With Turmeric recipe.
• Mix into soups, stews, or pasta sauce right before serving to preserve heat-sensitive nutrients. Add 1 tablespoon of the powder to my Nutrient-Dense Broth For Cold & Flu Season.
• Add it to smoothies.
• Add 1 teaspoon to my Instant Pot Beans & Rice
• Stir it into dips like guacamole or hummus
• Add it to baked goods like muffins or these Totally Satisfying, Gluten-Free, Almond Flour Fudge Brownies
• Mix 1/4 tsp into homemade salad dressing.

How to Maximize Nutrient Absorption

To get the most from moringa’s nutrients:

1. Pair with Healthy Fats: Vitamins A and E are fat-soluble, so consuming moringa powder with foods containing healthy fats (like avocado, nuts, or olive oil) enhances absorption.

2. Consistent Daily Use: Many nutrients work best when consumed regularly rather than sporadically.

3. Proper Brewing: When making moringa tea, steep for 5-7 minutes in hot (not boiling) water to preserve heat-sensitive nutrients.

4. Combine with Vitamin C: The natural Vitamin C in moringa enhances iron absorption, but you can boost this further by adding lemon to your tea.

This is just another marvelous blessing and gift from Creator God for abundant health.

“The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.” ~Revelation 22:2

“And may we ever have gratitude in hearts that the great Creator in all His glory has placed the herbs in the field for our healing.” ~Edward Bach

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

Medical Disclaimer: I am no longer a practicing medical professional, and I am not doctor. I am a mother. I do seek scientific confirmation of the safety and effectiveness of the herbs and remedies I use. Using remedies is a personal decision. Nothing I say on this blog is intended to treat or prevent disease. Consult your own doctor.

The post Moringa: No Wonder I’m Seeing This Superfood Everywhere appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

There has been a renewed interest in the Book of Enoch as people sincerely grapple to understand the origins of the evil we see today, the nature of angels and demons, and the end times.

The Book of Enoch is an ancient Hebrew apocalyptic religious text and contains stories of the origins of the demons and Nephilim. The book is consistent with the fall of “the watchers”, or angels, as referenced in Genesis 6:1-2: “The sons of God saw that the daughters of men were fair and took them as wives.” It includes an explanation of why the Genesis flood was morally necessary, and a prophetic exposition of the thousand-year reign of the Messiah.

Even though these elements may be consistent with some references in the Bible, this does not necessarily mean it is inspired Scripture.

Wes Huff (my favorite historian, theologian and Bible scholar) discusses what is hidden in the Book of Enoch.

18 very fascinating minutes.

What is most commonly known as ‘the Book of Enoch’ is only the first book. The entire text is actually a collection of three different books. 2 and 3 Enoch are much shorter and thought to have been written later, at a different time. Copies of the earliest sections of the first book of Enoch were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran, indicating that while they are not a part of the Biblical Canon, they were used as historical books for teaching and learning.

In fact, it is referenced by Jude, the half-brother of Jesus, in Jude 14-15.

Because only sections of 1 Enoch were found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is debate on when the Book of Enoch was written and who the author is. Some think it was written between 200-300 BC, which would be after the book of Malachi, and before the New Testament. Others believe the first Book of Enoch was written much earlier by the patriarch whose name it bears, Enoch, who was the father of Methuselah and the great-grandfather of Noah. Because it is a compilation of several separate works, there could be several different authors over a time span of many years.

Why Was the Book of Enoch Not Included in the Biblical Canon?

The Book of Enoch is not recognized as the inspired Word of God or a part of the Biblical Canon. The word canon, in classical Greek, means straight rod or ruler and refers to any officially recognized collection of authoritative writings for a religion or group. To be included in the Canon of Scripture, a book has to fit into certain parameters set by early church leaders.

“These books were largely decided on by virtue of three factors: their divine qualities, reception by the churches, and connection to an apostle,” writes Michael J. Kruger at The Gospel Coalition.

There were a variety of reasons for a book to be rejected as a part of the Canon. Some of those include shifts in tone that don’t fit the style and narrative of the book and could have been added later. The extra stories of Esther are a clear example of this one. Another reason is the lack of manuscript evidence.

The Biblical Canon was ratified by the third Council of Carthage around 397 A.D, and the Book of Enoch was not included as a part of the Canon. While some parts of the Book of Enoch contain value, at some point, the book diverges from a biblical view, and the early church did not consider it consistent with other books of scripture. Therefore, it was not included in the Biblical Canon, or what we know to be the Holy Bible today.

Did Early Christians Read and Quote the Book of Enoch?

Early Christians did read and quote the Book of Enoch. As mentioned before, it is referenced in the Book of Jude, and it appears the early church was familiar with teachings from the book. In fact, Tertullian and Origen, both early Christian writers, wrote about it, so we can confidently say it was well known within the early church.

We can also assuredly say that while it’s clear the Book of Enoch was not a part of the Biblical Canon, it was used as a historical book for teaching and learning because copies of the earliest sections of 1 Enoch were found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. The early church would have been familiar with the teachings and understood them. In fact, some of its contents, especially that of Noah in book three, could have been legendary for early Christians.

While the early church would have known it as a historical and literary book, they would not have recognized it as sound theological teaching, and we shouldn’t either.

5 Key Themes In the Book

• The Fall of the Watchers: The book recounts how a group of angels, known as the Watchers, descended to Earth and took human wives, producing hybrid offspring called the Nephilim. This act of disobedience led to their imprisonment and the corruption of humanity.

• The Divine Judgment: Enoch witnesses a divine judgment against the Watchers and the Nephilim, which ultimately culminates in the Great Flood.

• The Celestial Realms: The book provides detailed descriptions of the heavenly realms, including the different levels of heaven and the celestial bodies that inhabit them.

• The Coming of the Messiah: Enoch prophesies about the coming of a righteous figure, often identified with the Messiah, who will bring about a new era of peace and justice.

• The Afterlife: The book explores the concept of the afterlife, describing the rewards of the righteous and the punishment of the wicked. (source)

Which Churches Still Recognize the Book Today?

Today, the Ethiopian Orthodox Church is the only Church that considers the book of Enoch to be scripture, and makes that recognition because of its appearance in Jude, but no other major denomination considers it to be inspired Scripture.

The Book of Enoch is identified in the Pseudepigrapha, which is a large collection of Jewish writings not included in the Biblical Canon, and they are generally considered to have been written between the Old Testament and the New Testament.

Pseudepigrapha comes from the Greek word pseudo, which means false, and ephigraphein, which means to inscribe or write falsely. This doesn’t mean these are false teachings, only that they are not a part of the Biblical Canon.

These are not to be confused with the books of the Apocrypha (Greek for “secret”), which are generally recognized by the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and a few other groups as scripture, but not by the Protestant church.

What Does the Bible Say about Extra-Biblical Writings? 

While extra-biblical writings can offer valuable insights and context, they are not divinely inspired and should be read with discernment, serving as a tool to understand Scripture, not replace it.

2 Timothy 3:16 states, “All Scripture is God-breathed and useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness…”

John offers a warning in Revelation to those who add or subtract from the Inspired Word of God. Revelation 22:18-19 states, “If anyone adds anything to them, God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. And if anyone takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.”

Ultimately, the Holy Bible is the final authority for believers and should always be used as the final “ruler” by which we interpret other texts.

Conclusion: Is It Okay for Christians to Read the Book of Enoch? 

Yes, it is okay for Christians to read the Book of Enoch, as long as it is read within the context of historical documents, and not as the inspired Word of God. Christians should read it with a discerning heart, understanding it is not authoritative or doctrinal.

The world has always had a large number of ideas, religions, and agendas, from early in the Old Testament to today. A Christian’s job is to read the Holy Bible as the ultimate standard and use other teachings as a way to discern the differences between the inspired Word of God and other religious books.

In fact, Christians read countless other books that are not a part of the Canon, and the Book of Enoch should be treated the same. It is another book to add to your tools to understand and speak intelligently with others.

Remember, the Book of Enoch was read by the early Church and known well enough to be referenced by Jude, and therefore, Christians can read it as we read other books—with discernment.

To learn more about the spiritual foundations of our current place in history, economics, politics, science and prophecy (and why Jesus said ‘the Last Days would be like the days of Noah’), I decided to get and read Rob Skiba’s book Babylon Rising.

There will be fascinating times ahead as the earth prepares for the coming of our Savior.

“The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may follow all the words of this law.” ~Deuteronomy 29:29

“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.” ~Ephesians 6:12

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post Is It Okay for Christians to Read or Study the Book of Enoch?  appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

Many Americans believe that parasitic infections are rare in the U.S. –that they are just a Third World concern. However, the CDC reports that native, imported, and animal-transmitted parasitic infections affect millions of Americans each year.

In my nursing experience, I know this to be true, and I think this topic is one of the most overlooked in modern medicine. 

Gordon Crozier, DO, an integrative physician in Orlando explains: “Parasites are becoming an increasingly common health threat in the U.S.”

And intestinal and organ-infesting parasites in humans are far from harmless. Ann Louise Gittleman, Ph.D., author of Guess What Came to Dinner? states that for 8 in 10 women experiencing tiredness, GI issues, brain fog, rashes, and other vague symptoms, intestinal parasites are to blame.

Functional medicine specialist Leo Galland, MD says: “Women over 50 are most at risk of harboring intestinal parasites since the production of stomach acid that helps kill the invaders drops rapidly with age. Intestinal parasites in humans mostly come from food and water, so any decrease in stomach acid increases infection risk.”(Drinking 1 TBSP of organic apple cider vinegar in 1/2 cup of warm water 2x/d on an empty stomach can help).

Dr. Galland adds, “Because symptoms are so varied, parasites are often overlooked as the cause.”

Dr. Berg lists 4 foods one can eat to make themselves more unattractive to parasites. 9 minutes.

Children of all age groups are susceptible to parasitic infections. Infants, toddlers, and children in daycare centers are at a higher risk of contracting giardiasis and pinworm infections. Contaminated water, feces from pets who then lick themselves, and other animals can also be sources of parasitic diseases in children.

Symptoms That Should Raise Concern For CHILDREN

While many symptoms overlap with other childhood illnesses, certain patterns strongly suggest parasitic infection:

• Persistent gastrointestinal distress: Diarrhea lasting more than two weeks without clear cause.

• No response to standard treatments: If typical remedies for upset stomach fail.

• Nocturnal anal itching: Especially common with pinworm infections.

• Visible worms or eggs: Occasionally seen on underwear or stool samples.

• Unexplained weight loss or poor growth: Despite adequate nutrition.

• Anemia symptoms: Fatigue, pallor, shortness of breath linked to hookworm infestation.

Other Symptoms Often Noted in ADULTS

• GI: most commonly include changes in stool, diarrhea, occasional nausea.

• Systemic: can include fatigue, fever, muscle/joint pain and teeth grinding.

• Skin: can include general itching, rectal itching, rashes or hives.

• Cleveland Clinic  also states, “depending on where you’re infected, neurological symptoms, like seizures, severe headache or disorientation.”

Common Parasitic Infections in Humans in the United States

Here are 5 of the most common parasites in the U.S. (source)

Giardia:

• Giardia, caused by the flagellated protozoan G duodenalis, is the most common intestinal parasite in the U.S.
• Symptoms include diarrhea, abdominal cramps, nausea, gas, and bloating.
• Children in close contact with someone who is infected, are most likely to get sick with Giardia.
• It is more common in areas with limited access to safe drinking water and in people who swim in or drink untreated water in rivers, lakes, and springs.

Pinworms:

• Pinworm infection (Enterobiasis) is the most common worm infection in the U.S., affecting about 40 million Americans.
• They are most common in school-aged children but can affect people of any age.
• The worms live in the intestines and rectums of infected people.
• Female pinworms lay eggs around the anus, causing rectal itching, vaginal itching in females, and sleeplessness.

Toxoplasma:

• Toxoplasmosis is caused by Toxoplasma gondii. In the U.S., more than 60 million people are chronically infected with toxoplasma gondii.
• Most commonly contracted from consuming undercooked meat or from cat feces.
• The parasite can pass to a baby during pregnancy and cause birth defects or miscarriage.
• Toxoplasma is unique because most people infected with the parasite do not have symptoms.

Ascaris:

• Ascariasis is a roundworm infection, and adult worms can be > 12″ long.
• Ascaris is one of the most common worm infections worldwide. It is present in the U.S. but less common than in tropical and subtropical regions.
• Symptoms can be severe with a heavy infection.
• Once eggs have been swallowed, larvae hatch in the small intestine and migrate through the bloodstream to the lungs. This can cause signs and symptoms such as a chronic cough, wheezing, and shortness of breath.

Hookworms:

• Hookworms get their name from the hook-like shape of their heads. They attach themselves in a person’s small intestines.
• Hookworm infection occurs when people walk barefoot on or consume eggs from stool-contaminated soil.
• Some people infected with hookworm have no symptoms, while others experience itching and a localized rash.
• People with a more severe infection may experience abdominal pain, diarrhea, loss of appetite, weight loss, and anemia.

Other multicellular worms including tapeworms, roundworms, and liver flukes can live in the intestines, other organs, or the bloodstream. (source)

So What Is the Best Way to Clean Out From Parasites?

While I recommend Advanced TRS often for many other health concerns, I cannot claim that the clinoptilolite zeolite product directly kills parasites.

YET… Anecdotal TRS Stories About Dumping Parasitic Infections Abound:

Many of these stories are really rather amazing, though most people don’t see whole parasites because they get broken up…

Below these testimonials, I will briefly share the science that explains why these great outcomes occur for many with parasitic infections.

————–

————-

————-

Lyme and tick-borne diseases are parasitic in nature…

—————

————-

—————

————–

—————-

——————

There is some serious layered detoxing happening here:

A number of studies explore clinoptilolite zeolite’s indirect supportive role and impact on parasites. The document ‘Zeolite Vs Parasites‘ lists them here, here, here, here, here, and here. This is a short summary:

• Toxin Binding: Parasite infestations often result in the release of endotoxins and ammonia from the dying organisms. As a clinoptilolite zeolite, Advanced TRS can firmly bind these toxins within the gut and bloodstream, easing symptoms like nausea or fatigue. (See #12a here for more insight into the science.)

• Heavy Metal Removal: Researchers agree that parasites accumulate heavy metals in their environment or host. Advanced TRS‘s acts as a purifying agent due to its ability to bind heavy metals like lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium and reduce overall toxicity. (See #2, 4, 9, 13 and 25 for the science.)

• Gut Environment Modulation: Clinoptilolite zeolite helps to restore and strengthen the intestinal barrier, maintains a balanced intestinal pH and flora to prevent re-entry and proliferation of new parasites, helping the body in being an inhospitable host for parasites. (See #12b, 12c for the science).

• Strengthens Body’s Defenses: improves the overall fight against invaders. In the studies above, in rats and in lambs, the clinoptilolite zeolite also markedly reduced GI parasitic infestation. (See #6, 8, 10, 14 for the science.)

[Many OTC parasite cleanses containing garlic, black walnut, oregano, wormwood, or grapefruit seed simply don’t deliver clear results – and many others are too harsh, disrupting normal healthy microbiome flora. Some should really be used with a binder like TRS to prevent massive die off symptoms.]

What Is Advanced TRS?

Advanced TRS is comprised of only 2 ingredients: zeolite clinoptilolite and purified water, so all research papers above on clinoptilolite zeolite apply. 

Negatively-charged TRS has the ability to bind and remove ~80,000 known positively-charged environmental toxins.

Our family has had first-hand success with TRS to clear out advanced chronic Lyme, prions and more, and now I’m coaching hundreds and hundreds of families to greater health. I invite you to be one of them.

My personal order link is https://www.coseva.com/products/advanced-trs

• TRS is tasteless and is sprayed directly into the mouth (or topically, if applicable). Each bottle contains 150 sprays. Do this at home at your own speed, but the I suggest you start slowly and build up per this schedule:

• Some families start seeing results very quickly in weeks. Many more report that the biggest gains show up after the 6-9-12 months mark as they need prolonged, DEEP detox.

• Purchase TRS as a ‘preferred customer’ at the lowest prices which is ‘autoship pricing’. You can cancel or alter autoship dates at any time. 

Dr. Jana Grimm, whose practice I’ve recommended here on DRAH, and who uses TRS in her practice as well, has several hundred anecdotal TRS testimonials for more insight on her website.

My Anti-parasitic Dream Team

For parasitic infestations, I often additionally recommend homeopathic medicine ‘worms’ 30c with TRS as the binder. Take 2 pillules 3x/day for 1 month, take 2 weeks off, then repeat 1 month only. Follow homeopathy rules of not touching the pellets. Pop them from the bottle to the cap and into your mouth. Chew or suck on them. Don’t swallow them. Take them 10-15 minutes before a meal away from food and drink. Take TRS as usual to mop up released endotoxins and ammonia.

Intro To Homeopathy and How It’s Helped Our Family

More reading about troublesome metals:

How To Safely Get You Child’s Lead Level Down to Normal (lead takes 90-120 days of detox to fully correct)

Heavy Metals Must go: They Cause Horrible Havoc In the Body

Mercury Overload Is A Direct Cause of Chronic Yeast Infections

What To Do About the Aluminum & Barium We’re Breathing? (TRS is how we stay protected from what is coming from the skies now).

“I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; my soul knows it very well.” ~Psalm 139:14

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post How To Support Your Body To Get Rid of A Parasitic Infection appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

Learn the best food and herbal home remedies for pain and inflammation, and discover how to address the 4 inflammation pathways at their root.

Inflammation is a fundamental biological process essential for defending the body against pathogens, toxins, and cellular damage. Tissue inflammation is a dynamic process that develops step by step, in response to an injury, to preserve tissue integrity. Local cells are involved first, and once activated, they produce pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines that, in turn, activate downstream pro-inflammatory signals. (source)

Fever, for example, is how you know your body’s inflammatory system is working correctly when you’re ill. But inflammation can harm you if it occurs in healthy tissues or goes on for too long. (source)

Dr. Berg’s 10 minutes video sums up several practical approaches to halt it.

At 8:45, he he mentions he has seen people with even the most severe autoimmune inflammatory conditions completely get rid of inflammation by adding one specific strategy. Also covered are 4 basic herbs that need to be included in treatment.

There are 4 biochemical pathways that act as “master switches” to turn pain and inflammation up or down:

1. The pain and inflammatory factory (COX)

2. The master inflammation on-switch (NF-kB)

3. The inflammation megaphone (TNF-∝)

4. The backup inflammatory alarm system (5 LOX)

What turned on the inflammation in the first place?

There are 5 primary causes that flip the inflammatory switches on, leading to pain and inflammation in the body. (By addressing the root cause, you can correct the pain rather than simply managing it.) The following 5 factors turn on all of the inflammatory switches:

• Insulin resistance

• Mitochondrial damage

• Chronic oxidative stress

• Leaky gut

• Chronic infections

Many anti-inflammatory treatments do not address all 4 pathways.

Ibuprofen is great at turning the pain and inflammation pathway switch off, and does so very quickly. Unfortunately, ibuprofen can also cause stomach ulcers and kidney issues, because the pain and inflammation pathway protects the stomach and kidneys. It also doesn’t address the other 3 inflammatory pathways, which is why people often have to take it repeatedly.

Tylenol works in the brain, affecting the central nervous system, but does not relieve any inflammation.

Similar to ibuprofen, aspirin works on the first inflammatory pathway, which can also affect your stomach.

4 Natural Supplements That Address All 4 Pathways

• Turmeric affects 3 out of the 4 inflammatory pathways! 

A double-blind randomized controlled study found that taking 1500 mg of turmeric with black pepper produced results comparable to ibuprofen without the side effects. 

According to the traditional medical community, 3,000 mg. is the maximum amount of standardized turmeric curcumin you should take per day, yet multiple studies used up to 8,000 mg with NO toxicity. Cancer would be one situation where more is used successfully. (source)

While turmeric spice typically contains between 2% to 9% curcumin, supplements may contain up to 95% curcumin. (source) And added black pepper is a natural piperine that enhances curcumin absorption. Incorporating turmeric into a meal with fats can increase the absorption of curcumin by the gastrointestinal tract.

One teaspoon of this turmeric golden paste recipe is equal to ~2,000 mg. You can also add golden paste to a variety of foods and beverages. For example:

• coffee or tea
• soups and broths
• roasted vegetables
• rice dishes
• lentil or bean stews

Best to take smaller quantities 3-4 times per day, especially if battling chronic neuro-degenerative, cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, autoimmune diseases, or cancer. When cooking with turmeric powder, East Indian cultures routinely use up to 3 grams (3,000 mg.) per day. However, turmeric can cause abdominal upset in some when taken in high doses, so it needs to be divided through the day. (source)

I purchase this very popular brand to have capsules on hand, and my husband takes 3-4/day (split up) of this nano-particle sized product that includes curcumin, boswellia, quercetin, berberine, and more.

Turmeric does NOT harm the liver. 

• Extra-virgin olive oil mimics ibuprofen’s effects at the molecular level due to the monounsaturated fats content and to the presence of phenolic compounds that have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Try adding it to your salad regularly.

• Ginger is anti-inflammatory due to compounds which can help reduce pain and inflammation in conditions such as arthritis and muscle soreness. It may also aid in managing inflammation related to autoimmune diseases. (source)

• Foods rich in omega-3 fatty acids increase the levels of omega-3s in your cell membranes and give protection against several diseases that are associated with uncontrolled inflammation. (source)

• Boswellia targets the 5-LOX pathway, also known as the backup inflammatory alarm system,

Related:

Turmeric: Evidence No-Side-Effect Power Beats Prozac, Ibuprofen & More

Inflammation Bomb: Tomato-Turmeric Pepper Soup Family Recipe

Alzheimer’s Recoveries Reported After Administration of Turmeric

How To Make (& Use) Highly Bioavailable Turmeric Golden Paste

“Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits…” ~Psalm 103: 2

****For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, totally ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post Naturally Shut Off 4 Chronic & Autoimmune Inflammation Pathways appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

To find out what is being used to color the farm-raised salmon one buys (or eats in restaurants), I decided to do some research. And what I found out may surprise you.

What Actually Makes Salmon Pink

In the wild, salmon don’t metabolize that bright pigment on their own. They get it naturally by eating krill, shrimp, and other crustaceans that feed on microalgae which contain abundant natural astaxanthin. It’s basically the same compound that gives flamingos their signature color and makes shrimp shells orange. This natural process is part of the ocean food chain.

Without sufficient astaxanthin in their diet, salmon will suffer ill-effects as it is essential for metabolic, immune function, and muscle, as well as a key nutrient in the protective coating on salmon eggs, which is the source of salmon eggs’ orange color.

“Farmed” salmon never see a krill or shrimp; instead they eat feed pellets created by scientists to mimic their diet in the wild.

Petroleum-based Astaxanthin

Essentially all astaxanthin used in aquaculture (fish-farming) is a petrochemical product. (source)

Artificial astaxanthin pigment is chemically different than its natural counterpart, and most of it is not bio-available to the fish. (source)

Thus, a farm-raised salmon’s added color isn’t natural at all.

NATURAL Astaxanthin, On the Other Hand, Offers Huge Benefits:

• It is 6,000 times better at fighting off free radicals than vitamin C.

• It is approximately 550 times better at fighting free radicals than that of vitamin E. (source)

• Astaxanthin outperforms CoQ10 800 times over in fighting free radicals. (source)

• As an antioxidant, astaxanthin is 200 times more effective than polyphenols. (source)

• In one randomized controlled trial, subjects who took astaxanthin for 12 weeks reported a significant boost in cognitive ability.

(I personally have taken this natural astaxanthin as an Internal Sunscreen & Antiaging Support for at least 6 years now.

The Synthetic Alternative That Farmed Salmon Eat

The same basic materials used to make plastics and fuel can be chemically converted into the pigment that colors your dinner.

In the early 1980s, Hoffmann La Roche developed and manufactured the first synthetic astaxanthin preparation, and later, Hoffmann La Roche sold the production rights to DSM (Denmark).

Synthetic versions of astaxanthin dominate because they’re cheaper and more available at industrial scales. The cost of astaxanthin is actually one of the most expensive components of salmon feed, highlighting its importance beyond just color.

Coloring the Fish

Salmon farmers don’t leave color to chance. According to research conducted by DSM, a company that supplies dye to salmon farmers, different intensities of salmon dye appeal to different consumer bases.

DSM offers a “SalmoFan” to their clients – kind of like a paint wheel, so salmon farmers can use this tool to decide how much pigment to add to achieve specific shades of pink. (source) The amount of astaxanthin added can be adjusted to achieve different shades of pink.

The deeper the color, the higher price retailers can charge.

Farmers are essentially painting fish to match consumer expectations.

What Regulations Say About Synthetic Astaxanthin

Synthetic astaxanthin has not been specifically approved for direct human consumption, but it is legal to use in salmon feed.

And when you eat that salmon, you inevitably end up getting some of that synthetic astaxanthin. (source)

The compound isn’t approved for you to consume directly, yet you consume it anyway through the fish.

The Transparency Problem for Consumers

A lack of transparency is a dangerous game to play with this generation of seafood consumers. Consumers increasingly demand to know what’s in their food and where it comes from. The salmon industry’s reluctance to openly discuss synthetic pigments creates suspicion.

Labeling varies wildly. The ‘color added’ label is a result of an FDA regulation that requires retailers to label foods containing color additives.

You might see this on some packages, though many farmed salmon products carry no such indication. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to tell the difference between wild and farmed salmon by reading the labels. (source)

The organization Oceana, found that 43% of the restaurants and shops they surveyed mislabeled salmon. The product is sometimes not labelled as “farmed” in the marketplace thus preventing shoppers from making informed decisions about their purchases. (source)

This lack of transparency prevents consumers from making truly informed choices. Let’s be real, this is all about marketing and masquerading as nature.

***For the Full Spike Protein Protocol to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

***If you found value in this writing, please share it, discuss it, and subscribe to my FREE newsletter. Independent, ad-free work like this spreads because of readers like you.

Also, please consider supporting my work by using my Amazon affiliate link when purchasing from there.

Censorship is real, so my Pinterest account was suspended; thankfully, a big part of my main board is still alive through this link!

You can also find me on Facebook, Gab, MeWe, X (Twitter), and Instagram.

The post The Synthetic Used to Give Farmed Salmon That Bright Pink Color appeared first on Deep Roots at Home.

The post New CHD Book, ‘Total Load Theory,’ Offers Practical Guidance for Addressing Toxic Overload appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post A Parent’s Guide to Healthy Children: From Preconception to Early Childhood appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post Total Load Theory: Transforming Lives in Autism, ADHD, LD, SPD, and Mental Health appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post Children’s Health Defense Supports Student Fighting to Get Back to School After Religious and Medical Vaccine Exemptions Denied appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post CHD Scientists Dispel 23-Year-Old Study Debunking MMR Vaccine’s Link to Autism appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post Upcoming CHD Book, ‘Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality,’ Provides New Insights on Old Perceptions appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post Children’s Health Defense Experts to Testify on Childhood Vaccine Injuries at U.S. Senate Hearing appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post Latest Poll: Almost Half of American Voters Support Reevaluating CDC’s Childhood Vaccine Schedule appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

The post Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality appeared first on Children's Health Defense.

Tags: Chelation, health, heart attack

Tags: Chelation, health

Tags: health

Tags: health

Tags: creation, evolution, racism

Tags: creation, evolution

Tags: creation, evolution